A FRANK MOVIE REVIEW: “EMMA” – 5/10

Movie:         “Emma”

Rating:         5 out of 10.

In a word:   Boring

 

     Be prepared for one more adaptation of the 1815 Jane Austen novel, first filmed in 1996 starring Gwyneth Paltrow. This movie, starring Anya Taylor-Joy follows the same basic characters within like-settings, mainly the breathtaking countryside of inner England dotted with landscapes and mansions much like any other period-based film about old England, to include a smattering of snobbery.

     If you like that genre, though unoriginal, you’ll like this movie. For sure, the photography is inspiring and the costumes awesome. The cast of actors played their roles well, including Miss Taylor-Joy’s lead.

     If there is criticism earned, it must be attributed to the director, Autumn De Wilde who gave us one scene after another of Emma’s gazing eyes and close-up expressions ad nauseam, slowing the film to a point of sheer boredom.

     The plot is simple: Emma Woodhouse is a young, beautiful, and vain woman who lives in a large mansion on the Hartford estate of her elderly father in the village of Highbury. She has no wish to marry, but enjoys pairing her family and friends. The film mostly follows Emma and her friend Harriet as they experience friendships, love and heartbreaks, complete with an array of misunderstandings because no one ever comes to the point in a conversation.

     One interesting item of trivia: When the gentleman, Mr. Knightly, asked Emma for her hand in marriage, the close-up shows the actress suffering from a nosebleed, that was apparently unscripted. But they left it in the movie anyway.

     Lovers of old-English aristocracy will like this film. Otherwise, be prepared to yawn.

     I give it a 5 out of 10.

Emma. (2020) – Trivia – IMDb

 

 

 

 

 

5 Responses to A FRANK MOVIE REVIEW: “EMMA” – 5/10

  1. Eileen March 9, 2020 at 2:58 pm #

    Thanks for the comments, Marshall. I plan to see “Emna” because there are so few movies these days that aren’t filled with violence, sex, profanity, and/or drugs.

  2. Frank J. Clifford March 9, 2020 at 3:12 pm #

    One of the classic British novels of all time.

  3. Rosemarye M. Levine March 9, 2020 at 8:26 pm #

    Always found theseJane Austen novels out of my comfort level–boring and without anything to redeem them, Keep on truckin’==Rosemarye

  4. Helen Bennett March 10, 2020 at 7:28 am #

    I never liked the novel “Emma” (nor the update based on it, “Clueless,”) so I do not intend to see it.

  5. Helen R. Frigo March 10, 2020 at 11:19 am #

    We just watched the DVD of: “To walk invisible”: the Bronte sisters, which was NOT scenic England; plain people. Which made me get the dvd: “Jane Eyre” at the library. Many versions there. We watched the Franco Zeffirelli version, with William Hurt. Again, more true to life, we thought. Thanks for the “Emma”
    review, Marshall. We’ll skip it. And for those interested in women’s lives: “Linda Ronstadt: the Sound of my voice” was worth the wait on Netflix, and we’re going to watch it again. Grandfather inventor, tries to cure Parkinson’s; Mexican father, women among guy rock stars, Gilbert and Sullivan bel canto singer! Incredible voice, well made movie.

Leave a Reply