JOHN BRENNAN: WHOSE SIDE IS HE ON?

Jun 4, 2010 | Politics & Government, Radical Islam

John O. Brennan. Remember the name.

Currently, he is assistant to the president and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. It’s believed that Mr. Brennan was also considered to head the CIA. Perhaps, one day, he may take Hillary’s place as Secretary of State…but that’s speculation.

I’ll save editorial comments for the conclusion.

During a recent speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Mr. Brennan described violent extremists as “victims of political, economic and social forces.”  (Victims?) He added, that those who plot violence against the United States should not be described in religious terms, i.e Islamists.

I hope you’re sitting down. Remember, this is one of our leaders with whom our government has placed enormous trust.

He added, that we do not describe our enemy as “Jihadists” or “Islamists” because Jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam.

Click here: ObamaAdviser Jihad “Legitimate Tenet of Islam”

The following video is 40 seconds:

Click here: Newsmax – Brennan: Jihad a ‘Legitimate Tenet of Islam’

Now, we know Mr. Brennan is a well educated man, and that the technical definition for the term “Jihad” means struggle. That might fool some of us, but not most of us. We also know, by watching hundreds of radical demonstrations, listening to hundreds of Imams around the world, and reading doctrines formulated by al Qaeda, Hamas, and their international parent organization, The Muslim Brotherhood, that the term ‘Jihad” is most explicitly used to inspire millions of murderers and potential murderers around the globe to kill in the name of Allah.

“Jihad”, is also widely used as the inspiration to infiltrate western institutions for the purpose of one day creating an Islamic caliphate and to completely dominate the future world. Documents written by the Muslim Brotherhood itself speak to the definition of Jihad, which clearly state:

The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a “Civilization-Jihadist” process with all the word means. The Ikhwan (Brothers) must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who choose to slack.

Mr. Brennan surely knows all these things. Yet, he lies. At the very least, he deceives. The sterilized, sugar-coating of Islamic Jihad to present a harmless image is more important to him, than telling the hard truth. His job is to fool you and me. Virtually all of the world’s terrorist upheaval and religious intimidations throughout Europe and the Americas, are rooted in Islamic Jihad, not just today, but in the last 1400 years.

Mr. Brennan is our president’s hot choice for heading up one of the most vital segments of government entrusted with preserving our union and the future of America. One can only assume, the president endorses this kind of propaganda. Worrisome, indeed, because the Muslim Brotherhood has made their intentions explicit by…“Destroying western civilization from within.”
 
Mr. Brennan is not the only vital public servant in the Obama administration reluctant to tell the truth. At a recent hearing before congress, Attorney General Eric Holder basically refused to allow the term “Radical Islam” flow from his lips, no matter how pressed by a congressman. He refused to acknowledge that the radical side of Islam has played a major role in the global terror scene. This is our Attorney General. Watch:
 

Click here: YouTube – Eric Holder Refuses To Say “Radical Islam”  

I ask my more liberal minded friends, why are these good things? How can this kind of thinking at the highest levels in Washington, be accepted, even applauded? This is not a rhetorical question.

Meanwhile, two “Devout Muslims” have been appointed into high positions inside our Department of Homeland Security. That appointment was made days after a Jihad infiltrator by the name of Nidal Hassan, at the rank of Major,a physician, calculatedly murdered 13 Americans and wounded 29 others on our own military base, Ft. Hood…in the name of Islam!
 
 The families of the thousands who have perished at the hands of Islamic terrorists must be utterly disgusted.
 Dwight Eisenhower would throw up in his grave, if he knew.
 
I’ve asked before, I’ll ask again: Whose side is he on?
 
You cannot defeat an enemy if you’re afraid to name the enemy.
 
This blog represents but a few tidbits. There’s enough to write a book. Matter of fact, try reading “The Manchurian President” by Aaron Klein. 

Related Post

Frankly Speaking



Frank welcomes intelligent and insightful responses to commentary, especially from folks with contrary points of view and other insights to offer. Please keep comments pertinent to the title issue. Though some issues may draw passionate reactions, Frank insists on maintaining respectful decorum and will take the liberty of deleting foul language or an entire comment if it’s deemed outrageously inappropriate. He would appreciate responders who leave their names, city of residence and, if possible, e-mail address.

Frank has been writing and publishing commentary since 1994. His articles have appeared in various newspapers in North Carolina and Florida, along with short stories in many magazines. True to his moniker “Frankly Speaking,”(the title of one of his books) Frank wastes no words in presenting his message as he hits sharp and hard but above the belt. No one would ever call him politically correct. His critics are hard pressed to pigeonhole him as a liberal or conservative, as his views vary depending on the issue. Because he is not running for office nor seeking a job, the muzzle is off. One critic said, “I don’t always agree with Mr. Frank, but he sure makes you think.”