Archives October 2014


If ever there was an example why the Attorney General of the United States should be an elective position, it could be answered two words: Eric Holder.

     Never in the history of this country have we seen the top law enforcement official constantly act as a partisan protectorate of the president. 

     Never has an Attorney General stonewalled congress with dodging questions about one scandal or another, pretending he knew nothing about the IRS targeting conservatives, or Fast and Furious, AP surveillance, and more when they clearly came under his domain, and certainly had to have known and/or be supervised by him directly.

     Never has an Attorney General ever been censured by the U.S. Congress (joined by seventeen Democrats) after receiving a criminal contempt resolution for failing to produce vital documents in the Fast and Furious investigation. This was a deliberate act to obfuscate truth about a serious charge that our Justice Department was selling guns to criminals which ultimately resulted in the death of an American agent. Yet, it was sloughed off and tagged as a political partisan stunt.

     The writing was on the wall shortly after Barack Obama took office in 2009. Holder had barely warmed his office chair when he dismissed of charges against two members of the New Black Panthers for violating federal voting rights laws when they menaced white voters outside a Philadelphia police station wearing fatigues and a billy club. Had the KKK done the same to black voters, they’d still be serving time in Leavenworth today.

     Holder’s then top prosecutor of civil rights cases, J. Christian Adams, resigned in disgust and later testified before the Civil Rights Commission stating, “I was told by management that cases are not going to be brought against black defendants on behalf of white victims.”

     Too often, racial politics raised its ugly head during Holder’s tenure, most egregiously in the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case. The Attorney General went after the white defendant (Zimmerman) for shooting a black teen when the evidence showed that the shooting was an act of self defense. The Justice Department spent tax dollars on organizing biased demonstrations in Florida on behalf of Trayvon Martin, adjudicating George Zimmerman guilty prior to completion of an investigation. The Justice Department twisted arms in the Duval County State Attorney’s office to prosecute Zimmerman at the state level – when his acquittal was clearly imminent.

     In 2014, Eric Holder personally responded to Ferguson, Missouri to steamroll an investigation in support of the black folks, who had prematurely declared a police officer guilty of murdering a black teen, when the facts were still under investigation.

     Holder’s testimony before congress about the root of Islamic terrorism, was nothing more than a tap dance, refusing to associate the term Islam with terror.

     In 2013, Holder told congress he knew nothing about a potential prosecution of Fox News reporter, James Rosen, after Rosen was subjected to a federal search warrant pertaining to a leaked story. Holder approved of the warrant, then lied to congress otherwise.

     In 2012, The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of the telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press (AP). CEO Gary Pruitt described the DOJ’s actions as a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into news organizations.

     How could the president nominate an Attorney General whose private law firm was had defended 17 Guantanamo terrorists, and then expect him to be unbiased?

     Benghazi, IRS and Fast & Furious are three scandals that absolutely deserved a special prosecutor, much like scandals in the Clinton and Nixon years. But that would not happen when an Attorney General’s primary mission is to protect the president.

     In the states, nearly all (45) Attorney Generals are elected. As such, they are truly representatives of the people, not political lackeys for a governor.  

     The only way to prevent such a tragedy as we’ve seen in the Eric Holder debacle is to change the law. The Attorney General of the United States must be an elected position, not a cabinet appointee. 

Click here: Sixteen Scandals: The Legacy of Eric Holder | RedState


Click here: Did the Justice Department incite the 2012 Trayvon Martin protests? – The Week


I am no war monger.

     I opposed, in writings, the invasion of Iraq.  As a younger man, I had serious doubts about the value of Americans dying in Viet Nam. I believe the first Gulf War and the Afghan conflicts were truly necessary.

     There is no greater threat to the freedom of the world today, than what is unfolding in Syria and Iraq, by whom we call ISIS. It is as serious as the Nazi movement, which sought world domination; the only difference was that their God was in human form by the name of Hitler. And, it is only one more step in their overall plan.

     If we do not repel and decimate this threat now, it will metastasize and spread through the middle-east. And once emboldened, they are coming after the western world, at first with isolated incidents of violence, and later with mass murder.  It is their mission, for which they are all happy to die for. Literally.

     Such decimation cannot be accomplished with pin-pricks and aerial bombings of select targets. That’s like stepping on roaches while the nest thrives. Every military authority in and out of the Obama administration, plus the two former Secretaries of Defense have said a ground assault will be necessary otherwise we’re wasting time and money. And the longer we pin-prick, the stronger they get. They have the numbers, they have the power, they have the methods and they have the funding.

     To retreat and build a protective wall around western civilization only delays the inevitable onslaught which our kids and grandkids will have to deal with.

     The answer is: D-Day. We need to form a full-scaled invasion and assault.  There can be no half-way, otherwise it’s a losing cause. We must show strength, results and resolve, no turning back. It’s a matter of do or die, literally. For in the long run, millions more innocent bodies will scatter the landscape of continents.

     Along with our most loyal allies, we need to plunder, kill and destroy radical Islam everywhere, whether they are called ISIS, al Qaeda, Hamas, Boco Haram, Taliban or al Sharia…they are all the same ideology with the same purpose.  We must stop going after individual cockroaches, we must destroy the nest. The victims of the world, especially women throughout Asia and Africa and the middle-east, are begging for rescue from this international horror, for which the United Nations is virtually useless.

     If the general public would take the time to read the history of Islamic conquest, they would see that this is history repeating itself. Hasn’t anyone ever wondered how Islam spread so prolifically across the world, converting Christians and other non-Muslims by the millions in such a short time? Does anyone really think they did it by evangelizing in town squares?

     Watch ISIS closely. See what is going on today in the northern Syrian town of Kobani where most are trapped, awaiting their fate at the hands of mass murder. The only difference between today and the 7th century, is weapon technology and mass communication systems. The mentality is the same.

     They enter into towns and villages, separate young non-Muslim men (Dhimmis)  from their families and order them to change their religion, pay a steep tax (Jizya) or die. Many are beheaded for public view. This terrorizes and frightens onlookers, as they fear the same fate for themselves and loved ones. Their non-Muslim women, and/or Muslim women as well, are often raped and captured and forced into unwanted marriages or as slaves and concubines. Young girls are sold to older men for their pleasures. Children are herded into Madrasses (Islamic schools) where the Quran is force-studied ten hours a day until they are fully indoctrinated. These are the future “moderate” Muslims who, as adults, will live in peace.

     Why will they live in peace? Because the resistance disappears after one generation. Knowing little about Christianity or any other religion, all new children grow up to be loyal and obedient Muslims while mothers and fathers who could talk about the virtues of other religions are mostly dead. Old history books are destroyed. (sound familiar?) When everyone is Islamic, and there is no competition and peace prevails. 

     Yes, there are many stories of history where non-Muslims lived peacefully side by side with Muslims. But that was because, in most of those societies, the non-Muslims paid a special tax (Jizya) to stay alive.

     I concede that the majority of ordinary Muslim people throughout the world, particularly in Indonesia, India, China and Egypt, and some in western societies, are peace loving folks not interested in the jihad mentality. But every scholar whose books I have read, including Muslim authors, estimates that the fundamentalist/radical Islamic population is somewhere between 12 and 20 percent of the world of Islam. With 1.4 Muslims globally, that equates to roughly 150 to 200 million jihadists who are either part of the movement toward global conquest, or they support jihad with their generosity and finances. That’s a far larger enemy than Italy, Germany and Japan ever was.

    A Jihadist does not have to wear bombs and ammo belts. Thousands of Jihadists wear suits and ties, work among us in medical facilities, government offices, mosques and universities. When they send Zakat (charity donations) to outside organizations, the money is often filtered to al Qaeda, ISIS or Hamas. Plenty of “moderate” and well-educated Islamists have gone to prison in the United States for stealth support of terrorism.

     Following the death of Mohammed in 632 A.D., Islamic forces plundered through the middle-east, then across north Africa from Egypt to Morocco (the size of United States) and finally into Spain, where they controlled much of that country from 711 A.D. to 1492.  This was all accomplished with camels and swords and terror.

     Below is a list of books about the threat of terror and the history of Islamic Jihad. I hope everyone will take the time and effort to study the reality of what is going on today, and why it must be stopped and destroyed. Not contained. Not curtailed: DESTROYED.

     Or else, our kid’s kids may be next.

     I formed this list three years ago. Many more books have since been published, same subject. I urge everyone: Educate yourselves, then vote smart… or write your congress and your president.  Check with


 INFILTRATION – by Paul Sperry

HOLY WAR ON THE HOME FRONT – by Harvey Kushner


INSIDE THE KINGDOM – by Carmen Bin Laden

THE HISTORY OF ISLAM – by Robert Payne

THE INFIDELS – by David Anderson



AMERICA ALONE – by Mark Steyn





TAKING BACK ISLAM – Edited by Michael Wolfe

BECAUSE THEY HATE – by Brigitte Gabriel

STATE OF EMERGENCY – By Patrick Buchanan

STEALTH JIHADBy Robert Spencer

MUSLIM MAFIABy P. David Gaubatz

THEY MUST BE STOPPED – By Brigitte Gabriel



RADICAL ISLAM IN THE HOUSE – by Michael S. Coffman

 MILITANT ISLAM IN AMERICA – by Marshall Frank  (2007)

The following video link is worth watching. Clare Lopez, another amazing authority of radical Islam, gives a broad overview of the ISIS composition and future threat to our national security.  She’s a true intellectual on this topic.  She is introduced at the 6:00 mark by Tom Trento.

Additional links

Click here: US prods Turkey over inaction against ISIS | Fox News

 Click here: Dhimmi – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 


The upcoming mid-term election is far more crucial than people realize, and not for the usual reasons.

     While the media and the electorate in general, focus on governors, congressmen, senators, and local races tied to party lines, there is a bigger issue at stake which we should all consider. It’s more important than any personality or single candidate’s qualifications.

     I am a registered Independent because I have serious concern with the integrity of both major political parties. In a few words: They are all corrupt, by necessity. Groveling for big money translates to quid pro quo. Politicians on all sides of the aisle do not always make the right decisions for America, they make the right decisions to feather their political nest. That’s the American way.

     But this is one election I will be voting Republican across the board, even if I must hold my nose. Not because I love the party, but because it is crucial in preventing a dictatorship in the White House for the next two years.

     The only element that can stem the power of this lame duck president, who will no longer be answerable to the American people, is to strip his power base so that the executive branch can be reined in for the next two years.

     Mr. Obama has demonstrated over and again his determination to “fundamentally transform America” as promised in his first election campaign. The question is: Just how much does America need fundamental transformation? With all its flaws, I kinda like America. Yes, our country has always had issues which require attention, new laws, protection of rights, national security and so forth. But Mr. Obama has not only kept his promise, he has delved into dangerous overreach.

     The list of examples borders on endless. On the international stage, everywhere we look, the world is less safe. The middle-east is in chaos. Radical Islam is stronger and bolder than ever as terrorists openly terrorize and murder innocent people on video cameras as if to show the world how impotent America has become. The situation with Russia has shown our weakness, while Iran remains a nuclear threat like North Korea.

     Security at the border with Mexico has worked like a broken sieve, allowing a flow of hundreds of thousands poor and indigent aliens into our nation to feed off our entitlement systems or to commit crimes, while dangerous enemy combatants ride piggy back through the same sieve. It could be fixed, but that’s not happening. In truth, these refugees represent future supporters of single-party system.

     Syrian refugees are now coming into the United States by the multi-thousands, bolstering the Islamic population and undoubtedly introducing their fair share of anti-American sentiments. The Keystone pipeline, which would give our nation independence from foreign enemies, is at our fingertips, but quashed by this administration without good reason. And, nobody has taken notice that the Nobel Peace Prize winner has been anything but peaceful, as he and his state department openly supported the Muslim Brotherhood in the first Egyptian uprising.

     Why would an American president provide support to a parent organization that has spawned terrorist groups here and abroad, and who oversees more than thirty Islamic organizations that strive toward the ultimate overthrow of our way of life? And, that is documented by the Brotherhood’s own pen, as introduced into federal court in 2007’s Holy Land Foundation trial.

     Mr. Obama has two years left in office, according to the constitution.  Unless he outwardly commits an indisputable high crime or misdemeanor, he will never be removed from office. No congressman or senator in his right mind would dare even suggest impeaching the first black president.

     The next best thing is to diminish the power of the Obama presidency by electing a full slate of Republicans in the house and senate who can keep his power in check. The president also looks toward state politicians, including governors, to help advance and support the policies of the president.  

     Normally, we should not want to see a one-party rule in America. The counter-balance is needed so that we never suffer from a run-away government power.  The situation with Barack Obama changes all that, for the time being. That’s why I urge all Americans, no matter the office, elect Republicans in local state, and most especially, national elections this coming November 4th. The fundamental transformation America will shift into high gear his last two years if he has the backing of congress and state government leaders.

     I plead with voters:  Leave single-issues aside for one election and look at the bigger picture. Once the president basically becomes a full-blown dictator, it will be too late to reverse. 

Click here: An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America :: Archive Documents

 Click here: U.N. to dump flood of Muslim refugees on U.S.

 Click here: CHILLING Video: Famous Liberal Law Professor Warns of Obama Dictatorship; Urges Congress to Act


I challenge each and every blind liberal supporter of Barack Obama to view this one video which, in 2007, President G.W. Bush eerily outlines the reasons why it was so important to leave at least 20,000-plus troops in Iraq in order to maintain the peace and secure the region from terrorism. 

     Here, in part, are his words of that year:

     “I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region, and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.”

     That was in 2007, folks. It has all come to pass. Whether you liked him or not, George W. Bush was right. 

     Here’s the 4-minute video, several venues of the same speech: (scroll down)

     Click here: – President Bush Predicted In 2007 With Frightening Accuracy What Is Happening Today In Iraq

      I was not a big fan of President G. W. Bush. I wrote articles in 2003 opposing the proposed invasion of Iraq, stating numerous reasons why. It had nothing to do with conservatism or liberalism. But once it was a done deal, the next most important objective was be to minimize losses and to establish Iraq as an ally in the middle east and to keep the region safe and secure from terror.

          Bush may not have been the best president in history, but it is clear that he regularly attended security briefings and trusted his military personnel to know what was best for America and for the free world.

     According to White House records, Barack Obama attends about 42 percent of security briefings and otherwise reads them on his iPad daily. It’s difficult to imagine that a president of the United States – in a period of time when international terrorism is at its peak around the world – takes terror so nonchalant that he not only skips the majority of security briefings, he reads them on a device in which he cannot challenge, engage, debate, ask questions, delve, investigate, or do everything possible to make right his oath of office, to protect the citizens of America.

     Everyone in a position to know, including the past president, many of his past and present staff members, nearly all the military hierarchy, and his own prior Secretary of Defense, pleaded with Obama to leave 20 to 25 thousand troops in Iraq as a peacekeeping contingency force following the successful surge of 2007, much the same as we did in South Korea in 1953. But Mr. Obama was hell bent on keeping his promise to pull out entirely, despite the risks, and despite projections otherwise.

     Every disaster that has plagued the middle-east in the last five years can be directly attributed to the errant policies of this president, from Egypt, to Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Iraq, and Hamas’ expanded war against Israel. The ISIS debacle would never have happened had we maintained a reasonable force within Iraq.

     Nobel Peace Prize? Are you kidding me?

     The president would have us believe that Iraq’s Malaki government refused to guarantee liability against a small American contingency of five thousand, which – according to the Obama administration – is his excuse for pulling out. But that’s a load of c—p, because any competent president with a position of power could easily have negotiated that agreement once the numbers would be over 20 thousand. But the words were music to Obama’s ears, his perfect excuse for leaving the region. That was his goal. He achieved it.  Now look!

     We now have a forming caliphate, and the most dominant array of radical Islamists ever, with thousands of dead innocent people, with torture, hangings, rapes and decapitated heads rolling around much more than the media lets us know. And, the mongrels have their sights set for greater land grabs, including the west.

     Nothing could have gone better for radical Islamic terrorism, than the United States having Barack Obama for a president.

     It’s simply impossible to imagine that a U.S. president would be so naïve, or inept, or disengaged. The only other explanation is too scary to even suggest.

     I said it in articles five years ago:  I wonder whose side he is really on…

Click here: Fmr. Defense Secretary blames Obama –

Click here: THE ENEMY WITHIN? | Marshall Frank