Archives November 2011



The Republican debates, and all debates for that matter, are a sham

In the 90 or 120 minutes allotted, seven or eight candidates divide their times with questions which elicit short 60-second sound bites, and then some 30-second retorts by other candidates. Most of the questions are predictable and stick to the same old topics which generate the same old canned answers. To say it tells us anything about the candidates depth of knowledge on positions, is like saying a good putt by Tiger Woods tells us about his golf game.

Last evening was a different matter. While all candidates were invited, only Cain and Gingrich showed up as the Tea Party, via C-Span, hosted a 90-minute “Lincoln/Douglas” debate in Texas. Whether you’re democrat of republican, conservative or liberal, there was much to be learned by everyone from the two men on stage who had the time and latitude to give detailed explanations of their positions on three topics dealing with the economy, namely: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. It was a far cry from the media circus filled with gotchas and media-driven bickering between candidates.

The full 80 minutes of debate – which was more of a discussion — can be seen on this video.

This is a great exemplar for future debates in both parties. Do take the time.

 Click here: Video: Watch the full Cain-Gingrich Lincoln-Douglas debate



One never knows what’s going on behind closed doors.

People of all backgrounds, races, nationalities and education may often have character flaws which are aptly concealed in the public arena but stealthily emerge in the inner sanctum of privacy.

It was nearly seven years ago that Hillary Adams, then 16, felt that her life had been made miserable by constant and repeated abuses by her father, also sanctioned by her mother, that she had to do something. The next time she knew she was about to be beaten, she set her web cam in place and let it roll. Sure enough, Dad came through and used a leather belt the beat the crap out of her, with dear Mom standing by to egg him on.

That happened in 2004. It was not until recently, declaring that her father — a lawyer and sitting judge — needed help, that she posted the video to the net. It has since gone viral, and Judge Adams is suspended from the bench until the District Attorney can decide what to do.

Hillary’s crime, in this incident, is that she downloaded music on her computer she was forbidden to download. Hilary has a mild form of Cerebral Palsy.

This is a man who makes a living out of sitting in judgement of the behavior of others. How ironic.

Not all the facts are in. The case is now pending. Here’s the video and the rest of the story:

Click here: Judge William Adams Beating Of Teen With Cerebral Palsy Sparks Outrage (VIDEO)

Click here: Judge William Adams beats disabled daughter Hillary, 16, in YouTube video | Mail Online

As a police officer, as well as my personal life, I have often seen cases where people can live in positions of high respect, only to be a serial killer, rapist or otherwise, a disturbed person in their private world. John Wayne Gacy and Ted Bundy are two examples of intelligent men who worked and lived in positions of trust, amicable to everyone, yet when alone, reverted into an inner world of mental disturbance that no one suspected…except those who were the victims. Then it was too late.

Never be lulled into thinking that, “Joe would never do something like that.” You really don’t know. Anything is possible.

Millions of children who had no choices in selecting their parents, are abused in a number of ways, or seriously neglected, day after day, year after year, suffering enormous physical and psychological depravity, forming their fragile personalities into disturbed persons as well.

 I don’t have all the answers.

This kind of mentality also transcends into public life, whereby people in positions of respect, power and fame are not always what they seem to be. That goes for performers, sports figures and politicians.

Never say never.


My first selection guy would have been Rep. Allen West had he run. Then again, he’s a freshman congressman who needs some tenure before he can take that step. We should all keep tabs of his ascension in the future. It is inevitable.

After following the campaign, watching several debates plus studying the history of each Republican candidate, I’ve reached the conclusion that the best person to run against Barack Obama is Newt Gingrich. Here’s why:

1. There is no one in the running that is smarter than Gingrich.

2. He’s got a proven record of working in a bi-partisan mode, as he demonstrated during his tenure as Speaker of the House.

3. He’s got the experience, knowledge and guts to stand up to the rise of Radical Islam in the western  world  without capitulating to political correctness.

4. He will make mincemeat of Obama in a debate.

He’s not the prettiest candidate. He doesn’t have the charisma of a Romney or a Perry. But he would make the most decisive and competent president in this critical time of American history.

More important than anything, for America, is the defeat of Barack Obama – and his entourage — in 2012. Four more years of an unaccountable Obama in the White House playing footsies with the notorious Muslim Brotherhood will have a devastating effect on our country, and on the free world including Israel. The fascist radicals who are currently rising to power in the middle east are determined to conquer us down the road, and have said so. They are counting on Obama remaining our president. No matter what candidate runs against him, he must be ousted.

The person most capable of doing that, is Gingrich. Yes, he’s smart and experienced. But the campaign results will most likely rest upon performance in debates. Gingrich is far ahead of the other candidates as a debater. Therefore, he’d stand the best chance of beating Obama.

Gingrich doesn’t get sucked into the media-driven traps and the pettiness and the internal bickering that Romney, Perry and Santorum fall into. Gingrich is gutsy enough to admonish the media in their handling of the debates, rather than denigrate or argue with fellow Republicans. He stands on issues, unambiguously. I don’t agree with all his points of view — nor anyone else’s — but I know, as an American, I’d feel safe and comfortable with him at the helm of the executive branch of the government.

Pay close attention to his speaking on various issues in this 9 minute video. Note: no prompter, no notes.

Click here: Newt Gingrich: Impeach judges – Crush and Replace the Left – 2012

One of his many speeches (5 min.) on Radical Islam and national security:

Click here: Newt Gingrich On The Threat Of Radical Islam – YouTube

Next to Gingrich, Mitt Romney is the man most capable of beating Obama. He’s a carefully groomed package of experience, sound bites and image. He would do a credible job, but he does not possess the brilliance of Gingrich.

Rick Perry can’t debate. He relies too strongly on his strong Christian base, his Texan culture and good looks, but the United States is not comprised of 310 million Texans. If Obama made him look bad on the debate stage, it would translate to four more years of Obama.

John Huntsman would be a good debater if given the chance, but the press moderators constantly focus too strongly on the front runners. His chances of winning the nomination is nil, as are Santorum’s and Bachmann’s. They should drop out before, or soon after the Iowa caucus.

Ron Paul is a compelling speaker who captures attention. He is also a good debater, perhaps the second best in the field. He knows he can never win the nomination, but the forum gives him a chance to air his altruistic views, some of which are worth listening to.

I like Herman Cain. I think Cain would make a good president because he’s smart, he weighs issues and he would surround himself with people who know the business of national security and the economy, and who are true Americans. He also pulls the rug out of the race card, which some democrats have conveniently used for three years when critics go after Obama’s credibility. Cain would pose a competent appearance on the debate stage, but not with the intrinsic knowledge and intellectual power of a Newt Gingrich.

Gingrich’s Achilles heel? He had an extra-marital affair in the 1990’s. Clinton had many affairs and still got elected. Eisenhower had an affair, so did FDR. Kennedy had several affairs while president, yet he is still revered. Before the era of media intrusion, I’m sure there were many others in the presidency which we don’t even know about. So, that’s a non issue.

If there is any chance at ousting Barack Obama from power in this country, I see Newt Gingrich as the most capable, on all fronts.

That’s why he gets my vote.



I’m beginning to catch on to the strategy.

It’s like the shell game. Keep the public and the media watching the problems with the economy, while another sinister agenda is going on unchallenged and out of sight.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government may have killed a few despots and terrorists in foreign lands to make it look like a successful war against terrorism is being waged. The Obama-loving media likes that very much. Kudos to the president. Don’t look anywhere else.

Well, some of us do look elsewhere.

On September 1st, I wrote a detailed blog article about the Muslim Brotherhood’s successful infiltration and positions of trust they’ve gained in, of all places, the White House. This was first brought to my attention in a speech made by a secular Muslim, Tarek Fatah, in Canada where he warned people that Barack Obama was employing people connected to the Muslim Brotherhood in advisory positions of trust. When I investigated, I found it to be true. Here was my article then:


By now, I would hope most Americans are fully aware of who and what the Muslim Brotherhood stands for: Islamic domination on a global scale, either through violence or deception, while feigning to be moderate. There are hundreds of investigatory books and documents which have chronicled that fact.

Therefore, one would think that our president and his cabinet would be super alert and careful to prevent any risks to national security. Not only is that not happening, the risks to national security are being breached by the hour, every day, while we citizens and our media look the other way.

Fortunately, there are a few who are pressing the issue.

In addition to the Islamists named in my article on September 1st, we now learn from former FBI Agent, John Guandolo, that additional Islamists connected to the MB are working in other areas of government, including the Department of Homeland Security, namely Arif Alikhan and Koreem Shora, who is Janet Napolitano’s senior policy advisor. These , and others, have had close associations with sleazy Islamists and are deeply rooted in many Islamic organizations in the U.S. many of which have been identified as being formed by or closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood. There can be no good to come of this gross breach of national security. And, the world of radical Islam are getting everything they want.

For the full article, read:

Click here: Third Muslim Brotherhood Figure in Obama White House Identified, Plus in U.S. Navy

More. Recently, Janet Napolitano was grilled by Congressman, Louie Gohmert, of Texas, about hiring and swearing in Mohamed Elibiary as a Homeland Security Senior Advisor, with access to classified information and top secrets. Elibiary has allegedly been attempting to leak intelligence and shop classified information to the media. Elibiary was known to have attended a special honorary function where he gave a speech in support of Ayatollah Khomeini, the Irani cleric who radicalized Iran basically helped to start WW III. Napolitano played dumb.

This is what’s going on folks. If we can learn this much, there’s a lot more going on behind the scenes that we don’t know.

Click here: Rep. Louie Gohmert presses Napolitano over her granting security clearance to Mohamed Elibiary – Jihad Watch

Feeling safer?

And no one questions why Obama called for the removal of Hosni Mubarak from the rule over Egypt? Mubarak had declared the Muslim Brotherhood to be outlawed. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is sitting pretty, poised to assume leadership over the Egyptian government.

And no one questions why Obama has called for Israel to return to 1967 borders, which fits perfectly into the Muslim Brotherhood goals.

Can’t anyone see what is happening here?

Meanwhile, keep your eye on the economy. Don’t look anywhere else, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, NY Times, Washington Post, etc., etc. You too, Fox News. If you’re going to report important information then get started. Herman Cain’s flirtations of the 1990s is all the headlines, while our government has got the fox guarding the hen house.

Then, there is the closest aid to Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, in the form of Huma Abedin, who was raised in Saudi Arabia, and whose brother is aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood in Oxford, England, and mother is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood. This woman has access to the inner circle of security within our State Department. If she applied to be a local cop or FBI agent, she’d never get past the first round of security clearance. But she’s inside the State Deparment. And we don’t care?

Click here: Israpundit » Blog Archive » Obama intends to rule the World