WHY?

Since March, we have been engaged in a military action against a regime in Libya that did not attack – or threaten to attack — any other country, include the United States and/or our allies. But we’re dropping bombs and firing rockets at their government forces.

Why?

This action has been decried by some members of congress and media as “illegal” because the president has not sought constitutional authorization for approval and for funding within the two-month requirement. But there is not outcry.

Why?

The media, most of whom are affected with undying love for this president, remains silent.

Why?

Regimes in other countries have been brutally attacking rebellious civilians in other countries of the mid-east, but we haven’t sent troops to Syria, or Yemen, or Egypt, or Tunisia.

Why?

Israel is constantly under siege by rocket attacks from Hezbollah at the northern border, and by Hamas at the southern border, but we rarely hear a peep from the media or our administration. The rockets continue striking Israeli citizens, and no one does anything.

Why?

Sudanese civilians who are non-Muslim have been under siege by Islamic radicals for years, with millions slaughtered, while the government stood by and did nothing. No U.S. troops or NATO forces were sent in.

Why?

Robert Mugabe is the dictator of Zimbabwe who has been responsible for thousands of murderous acts against those who would oppose his regime. The U.S. and the world community stood by and did nothing.

Why?

Today, we see and hear horror stories about women and children suffering from disease and starving to death in the deserts of Somalia and Sudan. Yet, the oil-rich Saudis and Iranians continue pouring their mega-millions into U.S. universities, prisons, mosques and pro-Islamic propaganda, but offer little aid to the suffering. But we stay mute and dare not criticize.

Why?

In 2009 and in 2011, much like in Libya, the desperate Iranian people tried to revolt against the oppressive, fundamentalist mullah machine of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They were shot, brutalized and arrested by government forces. There was no NATO outcry. There was no intervention. The president did nothing except denounce violence — the canned statement every leader makes in public forums. He didn’t send in troops. He didn’t call for the removal of the president or issue moral support for the people crying for freedom. He did — basically — nothing.

Why?

Now Libya? If any United States soldiers or pilots are killed in the Libyan operation, will they have sacrificed their lives in defense America? If not, then for what?

Why is the president not being held in account for spending billions more dollars in weapons, materials and manpower for attacking a nation that poses no national security threat to the United States? Especially, a president who ran a campaign denigrating the previous president for doing the same thing.

Liberals, Libertarians, and even some Republicans throughout America excoriated President Bush for sending troops into a country without provocation. These same people give Obama a pass. ‘It’s okay, Mr. President, because, well, you’re the president.”

Why?

At least eight nations of the middle east erupted into violent dissension within a two-month period this year. Why? Was this sheer coincidence?

Is it coincidence that the burgeoning regime rising from those ashes is the Muslim Brotherhood, the power behind international Jihad? That was no accident. The Muslim Brotherhood’s basic documents call for the establishment of Islamic caliphates in the western world. Their purpose for existence is Jihad. Their plan is specific. Are we to believe that our government leaders didn’t know they were looming in the wings when little people like myself knew it? Our government leaders, including the current administration and many within congress certainly knew it, yet they did more to aid the acceleration of the Brotherhood — than to suppress it. Mubarak was our ally. The Muslim Brotherhood is the master organization of Jihad.

Why?

Now, while all this is going on, and for the first time in history, a U.S. president has openly sided with the enemies of Israel in demanding that Israel return land to the Palestinians to pre-1967 borders that are indefensible. That same president is fully aware that Hamas and Hezbollah — which did not exist in 1967 — have been regularly shooting rockets into Israel’s towns and cities, and are loading up with mega-tons more arsenals. The assaults upon Israel is common knowledge. The history of Israeli concessions ALWAYS ends up in more attacks on Israel. Yet, the president caves to the Palestinian’s demands, without demanding that Israel’s right to exist be recognized.

Why?

The president knows that those eastern borders would be indefensible, and that the forces behind the radical Islamic world are hell-bent on the total destruction of Israel. But that does not seem to matter.

Why?

Forget about the prevailing political issues like the debt ceiling, the slate of Republican candidates, same-sex marriage and gun control. Forget about economic matters, labor unions, social issues and other political minutia. If and when the radical Islamic menace attains their goals, all that won’t mean a thing. What will have meaning, is radical Islam.

The American people are in denial. People refuse to see what’s in front of their noses. And Barack Obama, the greatest asset of the stealth Jihad movement around the world, may actually get reelected in 2012.

Why?

The following video is a speech by, Col. Allen West, then a candidate for congress, talking about international Jihad. This is from the horses mouth. He pulls no punches. It’s 19 minutes, but his speech ends at the 12 minute mark. Well worth the listen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgZppLvjvaE&feature=related

Click here: Obama’s Libya action is verging on tyranny | LibertyLog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3aeJSwgKa8