Archives April 2011

OBAMA'S MYSTERIOUS PAST: THE WALLS CLOSE IN

Donald Trump recently raised the issue of Barack Obama’s mystery birth certificate on the TV show, “The View,” suggesting the president should just release it, and get it over with. Not unpredictably, Whoopie Goldberg immediately blew her gasket citing (what else?) Racism! “No white president has ever been asked for his birth certificate,” she said. ‘So, why Obama?” insinuating it’s only because of his skin color.
Answer to Whoopie: This has nothing to do with Race. Never in the history of this country has so much secrecy shrouded a president. The so-called “transparency” of Barack Obama has become the ultimate oxymoron.
First: It is a daunting question, indeed, that anyone would spend so much effort and money in legal fees to prevent disclosure about a basic question of identity, particularly the president of the country.
Second: The reason for the constitutional requirement, is to ensure that no leader of this country will ever hold a dual allegiance to any foreign entity.
Third: The issue of trust. Even if the laws did not preclude Obama from being a president, how can the media and the public, in general, trust someone who will not disclose a basic document that all government employees — city, state and federal — routinely disclose throughout America?
Fourth: In fact, John McCain ( he’s a white man, Whoopie) – and Obama’s opponent — was required by congress to verify his eligibility. In April of 2008, the U.S. Senate approved a resolution recognizing McCain’s eligibility to run. But, not Obama, who’s father was not a U.S. citizen and who has not authorized the release of his alleged Hawaiian birth certificate.
Fifth: Interesting to note that the newly elected Democratic Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, when taking office recently, made a public statement declaring he would settle the birth certificate question forever. Not long after, he retracted, admitting that document may not exist.
Click here: Hawaii governor can’t find Obama birth certificate
More questions have surfaced which add fuel to the fires of distrust. Let’s start with the mystery Social Security Number:
042-68-4425
This is the number Mr. Obama has been using since 1980-81. However, records indicate that it was issued in the State of Connecticut, where Obama never resided. Hmmm. In the spring of 1977, when Obama was sixteen living in Hawaii, the same number was used by a Connecticut resident who was born in 1890. Strange.
These facts were dredged up by licensed investigators working with Dr. Orly Taitz, who has initiated a number of legal actions against Obama in pursuit of the truth. This kind of information would be accessible to any tenacious and seasoned investigator. (For details, see links below) In fact, there have been at least seventeen other social security numbers that have been used by someone with the name Barack Obama, but that’s not to say they belong to the president, however odd. However, the fact that the president is using a social security number of deceased individual, and not issued to him, could suggest social security fraud for which penalties are attached. For me, and anyone, it raised a bigger question: Why even do it?
The same investigators endeavored into another mystery surrounding the president: His college records.
In Obama’s memoirs and speeches, he claimed that, while living in New York, he attended Columbia University two years between September of 1981 and May of 1983. Some folks might recall other past students of note who have said they never saw Obama there, including George Stephanoplous and Wayne Root, also a political science major, same years. But, okay, it could be that Obama was a low-key student and didn’t make many acquaintances.
Or … there’s another reason. Obama was not at the school during all the times stated in his memoirs. According to Columbia University records, he only attended Columbia from September of 1982 to May of 1983. That gives us one entire missing year, not to mention the lie. It also begs the question, where was Mr. Obama during that missing year? We do know he traveled to Pakistan in 1981 when that country was in upheaval and Americans were either banned or discouraged from traveling there. Was he in Pakistan longer than he disclosed? If so, was it more than a vacation? What was the reason, and on what country’s passport?
Are these the questions the president fears? Is this why Mr. Obama has consistently refused to release his college records to the Chicago Tribune and other reporters over the last three years? Aren’t we, the citizens of this country, entitled to be assured that the president’s source of funding to Columbia and to Harvard were legitimate, and not on the dime of a Saudi Sheik?
Simple questions beg simple answers. Anyone reading this article would have no problem with releasing biographical records in order to hold a government job. Except one person:
Mr. Transparency: The President of the United States
Study the link below in detail. It’s inconceivable that anyone who reads it and investigates the truth, could not have doubts.
Click here: FAC Filed in Lawsuit About Obama’s
Here is a 2008 article in Newsmax listing some of the issues Obama remains secretive about. Nothing has changed since and the media, accommodatingly, never presses the issue.
Click here: FAMILY HOUSE: NewsMax: Obama Most Secretive
The following is a World Net Daily article from two years ago, listing many probes into Obama’s background that he refuses to release. Pay particular attention to the section, subheading: Passports.
Click here: Obama: Where have all his records gone?
As the next campaign gets into high gear, it’s unthinkable that the secrets of Barack Obama will not become a major issue. Donald Trump’s campaign is only the beginning.
But there is one person who can make it all go away, and that’s Barack Obama.
It ain’t going to happen.
Click here: Obama Stonewalls; Refuses To Release Vital Papers

OBAMA’S MYSTERIOUS PAST: THE WALLS CLOSE IN

Donald Trump recently raised the issue of Barack Obama’s mystery birth certificate on the TV show, “The View,” suggesting the president should just release it, and get it over with. Not unpredictably, Whoopie Goldberg immediately blew her gasket citing (what else?) Racism! “No white president has ever been asked for his birth certificate,” she said. ‘So, why Obama?” insinuating it’s only because of his skin color.

Answer to Whoopie: This has nothing to do with Race. Never in the history of this country has so much secrecy shrouded a president. The so-called “transparency” of Barack Obama has become the ultimate oxymoron.

First: It is a daunting question, indeed, that anyone would spend so much effort and money in legal fees to prevent disclosure about a basic question of identity, particularly the president of the country.

Second: The reason for the constitutional requirement, is to ensure that no leader of this country will ever hold a dual allegiance to any foreign entity.

Third: The issue of trust. Even if the laws did not preclude Obama from being a president, how can the media and the public, in general, trust someone who will not disclose a basic document that all government employees — city, state and federal — routinely disclose throughout America?

Fourth: In fact, John McCain ( he’s a white man, Whoopie) – and Obama’s opponent — was required by congress to verify his eligibility. In April of 2008, the U.S. Senate approved a resolution recognizing McCain’s eligibility to run. But, not Obama, who’s father was not a U.S. citizen and who has not authorized the release of his alleged Hawaiian birth certificate.

Fifth: Interesting to note that the newly elected Democratic Governor of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie, when taking office recently, made a public statement declaring he would settle the birth certificate question forever. Not long after, he retracted, admitting that document may not exist.

Click here: Hawaii governor can’t find Obama birth certificate

More questions have surfaced which add fuel to the fires of distrust. Let’s start with the mystery Social Security Number:

042-68-4425

This is the number Mr. Obama has been using since 1980-81. However, records indicate that it was issued in the State of Connecticut, where Obama never resided. Hmmm. In the spring of 1977, when Obama was sixteen living in Hawaii, the same number was used by a Connecticut resident who was born in 1890. Strange.

These facts were dredged up by licensed investigators working with Dr. Orly Taitz, who has initiated a number of legal actions against Obama in pursuit of the truth. This kind of information would be accessible to any tenacious and seasoned investigator. (For details, see links below) In fact, there have been at least seventeen other social security numbers that have been used by someone with the name Barack Obama, but that’s not to say they belong to the president, however odd. However, the fact that the president is using a social security number of deceased individual, and not issued to him, could suggest social security fraud for which penalties are attached. For me, and anyone, it raised a bigger question: Why even do it?

The same investigators endeavored into another mystery surrounding the president: His college records.

In Obama’s memoirs and speeches, he claimed that, while living in New York, he attended Columbia University two years between September of 1981 and May of 1983. Some folks might recall other past students of note who have said they never saw Obama there, including George Stephanoplous and Wayne Root, also a political science major, same years. But, okay, it could be that Obama was a low-key student and didn’t make many acquaintances.

Or … there’s another reason. Obama was not at the school during all the times stated in his memoirs. According to Columbia University records, he only attended Columbia from September of 1982 to May of 1983. That gives us one entire missing year, not to mention the lie. It also begs the question, where was Mr. Obama during that missing year? We do know he traveled to Pakistan in 1981 when that country was in upheaval and Americans were either banned or discouraged from traveling there. Was he in Pakistan longer than he disclosed? If so, was it more than a vacation? What was the reason, and on what country’s passport?

Are these the questions the president fears? Is this why Mr. Obama has consistently refused to release his college records to the Chicago Tribune and other reporters over the last three years? Aren’t we, the citizens of this country, entitled to be assured that the president’s source of funding to Columbia and to Harvard were legitimate, and not on the dime of a Saudi Sheik?

Simple questions beg simple answers. Anyone reading this article would have no problem with releasing biographical records in order to hold a government job. Except one person:

Mr. Transparency: The President of the United States

Study the link below in detail. It’s inconceivable that anyone who reads it and investigates the truth, could not have doubts.

Click here: FAC Filed in Lawsuit About Obama’s

Here is a 2008 article in Newsmax listing some of the issues Obama remains secretive about. Nothing has changed since and the media, accommodatingly, never presses the issue.

Click here: FAMILY HOUSE: NewsMax: Obama Most Secretive

The following is a World Net Daily article from two years ago, listing many probes into Obama’s background that he refuses to release. Pay particular attention to the section, subheading: Passports.

Click here: Obama: Where have all his records gone?

As the next campaign gets into high gear, it’s unthinkable that the secrets of Barack Obama will not become a major issue. Donald Trump’s campaign is only the beginning.

But there is one person who can make it all go away, and that’s Barack Obama.

It ain’t going to happen.

Click here: Obama Stonewalls; Refuses To Release Vital Papers

CENSORSHIP FOR ISLAM THREATENS FREE SPEECH

 Inch by inch.

When my book “Militant Islam in America” first came out in 2006-2007, I arranged several appearances with a notable chain of book stores, where I already knew the managers, having appeared there for past book signings.

A few days after making the arrangements, I received a call from the district manager telling me to cancel the signings. “We’re unable to order you books,” he said. That was a lie. The books were available and returnable (for the unsold), so there was no valid reason to cancel the appearances, other than the subject title. The book store feared repercussions. I was being censored.

I speak frequently at libraries all over Florida and the southeast. When I arranged book talks for the new release on militant Islam, I had two of the library directors tell me I was welcome to discuss my books in general, but “do not talk about Islam.”

I had amassed a considerable bibliography of books written by experts and scholars, like Daniel Pipes, Steve Emerson, Robert Spencer, etc. So, I checked the book shelves at Barnes & Noble and Books-a-Million to see if their books were on hand in the stores. Not surprisingly, they were not. “You can order copies, if you want,” said the store managers.

It begs the question, how much information and literature is there which we are not privileged to know about? Is free speech being infringed upon, de facto?

I am just a little person in the scheme of things, no big name in the world of writing. One can only imagine how much information is being suppressed on a national level.

I don’t always agree with Harvard Professor and author, Alan Dershowitz, but I must cede to his vast knowledge of world affairs, especially as they are related to the mid-east, Islam and Judaism. Mr. Dershowitz is known as a liberal, of sorts, but also a realist. In a recent tour of Norway where he was invited by a Norwegian, pro-Israeli group to lecture on Israel/Palestine, he received a cool reception and was rejected by three universities from speaking on a subject for which he has written six books and is considered an international expert.

The schools told him he could talk about the O.J. Simpson case. But Islam, Jews and the Israeli situation? Off limits. Don’t want to ruffle the feathers of the growing Islamic population.

Click here: Alan Dershowitz: Norway to Jews: You’re Not Welcome Here

How’s that for free speech? How’s that for laying down to intimidation?

Norway’s foreign minister has apparently established a dialogue with Hamas, a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish state. Supporters of Hamas are invited to participate in the dialogue, supporters of Israel are not, according to Dershowitz.

So much for dialogue.

The Norwegians (which host my ancestry from my mother’s side) in 1980 had less than one thousand Muslims living in the country. Today, the Muslim population has swelled to 100,000, mostly due to immigration. Birth rates of Muslims, which exceed five times that of Europeans, suggest that Norway will be fully dominated by Islam in another two generations. The Jewish population is estimated to be around one thousand.

Speakers throughout Europe are being censored from speaking about anything that might hint of supporting Israel or criticizing Islamic extremism. And it’s coming to the U.S. where the First Amendment is being tested to the limits.

Alan Dershowitz, himself, wrote about the rise of anti-Israeli rhetoric being supported by — none other than— the ACLU. The trends are clear: Capitulate to Islam, don’t ruffle the feathers.

Jews? Well, who cares?

Click here: Dershowitz: ACLU Leaders Are Supporting Censorship of Israeli Speakers

Click here: Malmö, Sweden: Muslims riot over Israeli player in Davis Cup Match

The sad thing, is that the most intelligent of people simply do not, or refuse to, see it coming.

That’s good news for the rise of Islamic fundamentalism.

Inch by inch.