Archives March 2010

THE MYSTERIOUS PRESIDENT

 

For someone who claims the most transparent presidency in history, Mr. Obama remains the ultimate enigma.

Some folks will ask, “Why don’t you leave it alone?”

Answer: Because he is the President of the United States to whom we have entrusted the security of our nation and the future of our children. There should be no mystery about the person who is elected to this, the most important job in the world. He/she should epitomize the open book, where nothing is hidden and nothing is kept from scrutiny by the American public.

Yet, people who apply for city garbage collectors are more seriously vetted. Certainly police officers, firefighters, bus drivers, servicemen, FBI, CIA, DEA, newspaper and television journalists and college professors.

How would a prospective employer respond to an applicant for police, fire, FBI or journalist, if it was discovered that he/she had used at least sixteen social security numbers in a short lifetime? How would the government or a university respond, if an applicant would not release copies of his/her school records from college? Forget, for a moment, the hard copy birth certificate issue, which is a staple requirements for all government applicants. I don’t want this article clouded by those who can’t think past one dirty word: Birther. So, let’s move on.

The fact is, we know less about President Obama than perhaps any other president in American history and much of this is due to overt efforts to hide his records. This should concern Americans. A nation-wide network of researchers have attempted to fill in blanks, but at every opportunity, and quite suspiciously, Obama’s lawyers have successfully blocked access to various records. Obama’s legal team has spent well over $1.4 million dollars repelling inquiries and legal actions to unveil documents every American should have access to. The big question is: Why would he spend that money?

Another even bigger question: Why is this so unimportant to those Americans who prefer to look the other way? I ask my most liberal of friends: Why doesn’t it matter?

The president will not release his school records from Occidental College in California, where he used his Indonesian name, Barry Soetoro. One can only wonder what there is to cover up? Did he have a passport from another country? Was there a dispute about his place of birth? Did he go to the school as a foreign exchange student, thereby recording his citizenship in another country?

We don’t know. He won’t tell us.

Many folks who attended Columbia University claim they don’t remember seeing him there, though it has been verified that he graduated there in 1983. Some biographies state he maintained a low profile in those years. Fair enough. But why will he not release his school records, his college transcripts or his thesis? What’s the big deal?

The big deal, is the mystery.

Then, comes Harvard. The Chicago Tribune has gone on record as asking for records of Obama’s student loans, which was refused. Why? What is there to hide? Could it be that his law school education was funded by foreign sources? According to former Manhattan Borough president, Percy Sutton, (see link, below) Obama was being financially backed by one of America’s radical Muslims, Khalid Al-Mansour, a close business advisor to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. Talal is the nephew if King Abdallah of Saudi Arabia.

The famous “Bow” plays over and over again like a rewinding tape.

It’s what we don’t know, that raises questions. If Mr. Obama had taken out student loans, worked a part time job, had legitimate sponsors, and so forth, no one would raise an eyebrow. But the answers are not forthcoming. And when Percy Sutton’s TV interview resulted in the slip of the tongue, he was never heard from again.

Selective Service. American men are supposed to register for the non-existent draft. Correct? So did Mr. Obama. However, according to an article by investigative reporter, Steve Baldwin, to the Western Center for Journalism, Obama’s Selective Service Card was submitted in 2008, not in 1979 when he was a lad of 18, as required. Further, the card was apparently altered to make it look older. (see link) If true, why hadn’t the president registered when he was younger? Hmmm

And, why the altering? (It must be coincidental that he just happened to be running for president that same year)

Obama’s life has been researched in great detail, especially via the 49 or so law suits that have been filed challenging his eligibility to be the president. Some question where his true citizenship was based in those days. We all know that he traveled to strife-ridden Pakistan in 1981, at a time when American passports were not routinely welcomed.

However, in that research, it has been discovered that Mr. Obama has used at least 16 social security numbers and, depending on how the name spelling is skewed, as many as 25. Those SS numbers span numerous states, including California, Connecticut, Missouri, Tennessee, Colorado, Georgia, Texas, Wisconsin, Utah, Oregon and Hawaii.

Okay…maybe there are one or two other folks in America with the name Barack Obama. But not 25. That’s easy enough to check through computer records.

So, what’s the reason for all the numbers? In the law enforcement world, I could find seasoned investigators who could answer that question.

Then, of course, there is the infamous birth certificate. By now, we all admit that the on-line version is a phoney, so that’s out. (Why create a phoney to begin with?) An official in the state of Hawaii has allegedly stated that the hard copy has been seen and that it’s been verified that Mr. Obama was, in fact, born in the U.S. and is a natural born citizen.

That said, Obama supporters will claim that’s good enough. To an investigator who has dealt with sleaze and corruption as a career, it doesn’t cut the mustard, because (as they say) everyone has a price. The bottom line is that it is an easy matter to simply write an order giving authority to the state of Hawaii to release and produce the original certificate for public viewing. Easy. No sweat. Instead, $1.4 million has been spent to block such an action.

Why?

Maybe some of this is paranoid hype. Some people think I’m on a witch hunt. I’m just a right wing nut. I heard one woman say that people like me belong in a mental institution. Maybe so. But even if half of this article’s revelations are proven untrue, (which I doubt) I would still worry about the other half that are true.

Because it all spells a single word: F-R-A-U-D

We’re talking about our president. To whom we are entrusting nationalized health care, national security, immigration reform, relations with Israel and the mid-east, other allies, and our future economy.

Then, there’s Eric Holder…

Whoops…sorry.

Click here: The Mystery of Barack Obama| Western Journalism.com

Click here: Neil Sankey – Barack Obama Addresses & SS Numbers

Click here: YouTube – Barack Obama Financed By The Racist Radical Muslim

Click here: Newsmax – Obama Had Close Ties to Top Saudi Adviser

Click here: Was young Obama Indonesian citizen?

Click here: EXCLUSIVE: Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service

Click here: AP photo of school register reveals “Barry Soetoro” as muslim

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: QUESTIONING LOYALTY

The Attorney General of the United Sates is our chief law enforcement officer, endowed with enormous power with which to push forward a president’s political and ideological agenda. All AG’s do that.

In today’s administration, that is exactly what bothers me.

While we’ve found much to criticize about Alberto Gonzalez, John Ashcroft, Janet Reno, John Mitchell and so forth, never have we seen the likes of an Attorney General whose loyalty to the nation is in question. Now it is. And this is why:

1) Before becoming AG, Eric Holder signed a number of controversial legal briefs which he failed to disclose at his confirmation hearings. An oversight, he says. Two of those were briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court in defense of terrorist Jose Padilla, who was declared an “enemy combatant” the previous administration. Well, I suppose it’s easy to overlook those kinds of minor details when you’re vying to be the AG. Imagine that. A defender of America’s sworn enemy, becomes the Attorney General of the U.S., and there are some folks who will say, that it doesn’t matter.

Click here: Att’y general failed to give legal briefs to Senate

2) In 2004, Holder and his law firm was involved with then Illinois Governor, Rod Blagojevich, as special investigator to the Illinois Gaming Board, for which he received $300K.

Controversial? Well yes, but not just because of commiserating with the pool of sleaze. It was another one of those “oh, I forgot” omissions from the 47-page questionnaire by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Click here: Corruptocrat AG Eric Holder’s “forgetfulness” strikes again

3) We all know that Mr. Holder was a senior member of a powerful D.C. law firm who had represented, pro bono, seventeen of the Gitmo detainees, (AKA, Terrorists, AKA Enemies of the United States). We also know that this minor detail was not fully disclosed at his confirmation hearings. Now we learn that the Department of Justice (under Mr. Holder) is employing nine attorneys from that law firm, five of whom were directly involved in representing the detainees (enemies of the U.S. ) as defendants. And get this: Mr. Holder is refusing to identify the names of those attorneys. Maybe Mr. Holder forgot that they are, in fact, appointees of the president, who calls his, the most “Transparent Administration.”

Click here: Justice Department’s disclosure of nine Obama appointees’ – NYPOST.

Now doesn’t that make you feel confident in America’s top law enforcement official?

It would appear at least, these disclosures represent a conflict of interest for which Mr. Holder (or the president) should be appointing a special prosecutor. Then again, it’s people of integrity who would do that. Ms. Reno appointed Kenneth Starr as independent prosecutor in the Clinton fiasco, to the president’s chagrin. Don’t expect the same from Holder.

It would appear at worst, that Mr. Holder has a special interest in the defense of terrorists, i.e. enemies of the U.S., and is deliberately doing all he can to ensure that the enemy has every chance at freedom. (Translated, that means free to kill us)

4) These concerns are further exacerbated by Mr. Holder’s decision to try the 9/11 terrorists, including Kalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of the worst wartime attack on U.S. soil in history, in a civilian courtroom where his confessions will be subject to suppression because Miranda rights were not administered, and where he will surely demand a jury of his peers. Not only does this provide a world stage for the benefit of al Qaeda, it will put the U.S. on trial for the methods used to gain confessions and other war time tactics. This, when Mr. Holder has a clear choice via the Military tribunal system. It is mind boggling.

Interesting to note, that the decision was made without consulting or informing anyone else in the network of national security or diplomatic relations, including the Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano.

5) When considering all of this, we reflect back on Mr. Holder’s decision early in the Obama presidency, to release copies of classified CIA memos dealing with enhanced interrogation methods. While a host of prior CIA directors including Leon Panetta, the current CIA chief, strongly objected to this tactic, citing the harm it would do to national security, the administration found it necessary to do it anyway thereby undermining the country’s intelligence network. There can be no advantage to the national security of the United States, here or abroad, by unnecessarily providing the enemy all the classified information they need to continue their sordid plans to destroy our country and kill Americans.

This doesn’t even address the waning morale of the national security team, namely the CIA, FBI, NSA and various other military intelligence units who are more afraid of their own administration than they are the enemy.

Click here: Democrats’ Assault on the CIA – Council on Foreign Relations

Something stinks in Washington. This is a war like none other. Our greatest weapon, is not bombs, planes and guns. Our greatest weapon is intelligence. Without valid and active intelligence, our nation’s security will be severely handicapped.

When all the dots are connected, one must ask: whose side is the Attorney General on? What is the true agenda, behind the scenes?

You see, all this added together spells good news for al Qaeda and other Jihad networks, thank you Mr. President, and thank you Attorney General. Seems to me, there is some mention in the constitution about giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

If Mr. Obama ever had an opportunity to show his loyalty to the country as an American, now is the time to fire Eric Holder. Then realign the path of national security to make us all feel safe again.

Health care, stock market, housing market, education, etc. are all important issues. But they are meaningless if America falls.

ONE LINE MUSINGS

 While laying in bed awake, like most of you, thoughts swim. So, I’ll share some of those in one-line contemplations…no rambling discussion needed. Just a few items to consider.  Enjoy. Think. Ponder. Argue.

It’s a blessing to have a brain with the power of reason. It’s also a curse.  

Rap Music is an oxymoron

Tongue studs are not just for decoration

Nose rings remind me of boogers

Pants hung below the ass, baring underwear, is an insult

The “War on Drugs” is lost, always has been

Strange, that the war on drugs excluded “nicotine.”

Charisma means more than resume` for gaining elective office

Ghandi was the most Jesus-like mortal in my lifetime

What religion was Cro Magnon?

Can you whistle the tunes to any song by Ice T or Eminem?

Corporate favors for politicians is nothing less than bribery

Why do lawyers donate to a judge’s campaign?

Why is white racism disgusting, while black racism is acceptable?

There is nothing funnier than a fart  

Forcible rape is a power crime, not a sex crime

The government is responsible for the majority of crime in America

The voice of Sarah Brightman is the closest to absolute perfection

Islamic Jihad is, by far, the most important issue facing the future of America

There’s no such thing as a War on Terror. Terror is a tactic not an enemy.

Transparency/Obama is another oxymoron

Babe Ruth was the greatest natural sports figure of all time

An atheist stands less of a chance to be president than a Jihadist.

Voters should be over 21 years of age

Professional sports figures aren’t worth multi-millions of dollars for running and throwing

Government corruption and corporate greed is why we are still beholden to foreign oil

Daniel Day Lewis and Meryl Streep are today’s pinnacle among movie actors

Immigrating to this country is a privilege not a right

I have zero trust in Barack Obama as president, which has nothing to do with party lines.

The last president we could truly trust was Eisenhower

Only three of the Ten Commandments pertain to modern law

Not every mother and/or father deserves to be honored

No baby is born with a religion

Political correctness will foster more terrorists like Nidal Hassan

Being old is better than I could have imagined

One of modern times’ greatest losses, is the mystery to sex.

The Nobel Peace Prize became worthless when it was awarded to Yassar Arafat

Death is nothing to be afraid of. I worry more about the final journey.

American youth is more obsessed with appearance than with accomplishment

No diet plan works unless you eat less food

There were no fat people in Auschwitz

Why would race matter to blind people?

Honest politician is another oxymoron

Divine or not, Jesus’ messages of love is valuable for all people

I can’t imagine life without accomplishment

Blind love can lead to self destruction

Sending an innocent to prison is worse than murder.

Today’s adult Americans have lived in the best of times

Our great-grandchildren will not be living in the best of times

I often come near to tears when I hear “America The Beautiful” … for more reasons than one

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JIHAD TAX ON AMERICA

 

One year ago, in a speech before the Turkish parliament, President Obama declared “We are not at war with Islam.” Basically, he said that our concerns were confined to al Qaeda.

One wonders if the president is naive, uninformed, playing a game of words, or if he has some other motive.

While that may be true in a general sense, it worries me as an American citizen that the president is not recognizing that our war is most definitely against Radical Islam, better known as Jihadists, which comprise an enemy far greater than the combined enemies of Nazi Germany, Italy and Imperial Japan in WW II. Thus it’s a matter of semantics. And, the troubling factor is that this enemy is as much covert as it is overt.

No, we are not at war with peaceful Muslims that live in Turkey, Indonesia and other parts of the world, including America. But we are definitely at war with those who represent them as warriors whose mission on behalf of their God is to spread Islam as the dominant religion throughout the world, who teach their children to hate Jews, Christians and all non-Muslims, and that apostasy (changing religion) is forbidden and punishable by death.

According to Daniel Pipes, Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Spencer, Steve Emerson, etc. all experts/scholars on the global Jihad situation, about 15 percent of Islam can be considered “extremists” or “radicals.” Considering there are 1.4 billion Muslims in the world, roughly 250 million of them would then be Jihadists, meaning…those who are actively engaged in Jihad, or are engaged in some degree of support for Jihadists. The huge number of them are not wearing Jihadi garb, a la al Qaeda and Hamas, the most dangerous of them walk among us as “moderates.”

Don’t forget the tactic known as “Taqiyya.”

Click here: YouTube – Taqiyya – Lying For Islam

Obviously, Mr. Obama has not read much of the writings that have come from the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), the largest extremist organization in the world, influence and membership is based in over 70 countries. The MB is what has spawned the C.A.I.R organization, the Muslim Students Association (MSA) and many other strategic organizations which has set it’s sights on spreading Islam to become dominant in the west.

You may have seen it before, but read it again. Here is part of the documents recovered from the Muslim Brotherhood:

“…work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other
religions.”

 

 

Click here:General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America

Sounds like a declaration of war to me.

The mistake Americans make, is an old mind-set that defines “war” as deploying the military: Guns, planes, tanks. This is a far different war. While we have sent our G.I.’s and generals to far away lands, the enemy is walking right through America’s back door, compliments of political correctness, entitlements and pure ignorance. Their motives are grave, their goals are for the same end result as a gun war: Conquering the West. It’s only the strategy that is different. Instead of using guns, it’s about brains, fear, intimidation, propaganda, money, and deceit.

Speaking of money, if anyone doesn’t think the entire world, and most especially, the U.S. has not been subject to an Islam tax, think again. We are being taxed to the hilt because of the world of Islamic terror. Besides loss of life and human suffering, ask about the cost to Americans for:

* Destruction of World Trade Towers and Pentagon on 9/11

* Rebuilding a new tower

* Pay-outs to victim families for 9/11

* Additional security fees on airline tickets

* Homeland Security, FBI, NSA, and other federal agencies dealing with Islamic terror

* The War in Afghanistan

* The war in Iraq

* Foreign aid as payments to Islamic nations to keep peace…which is a form of bribery

Though not labeled specifically as “Tax,” these enormous costs are borne by the taxpayer.

Thus far, it reaches more than a trillion dollars, as reported by Bill Warner, Center for the Study of Political Islam.

Click here: Political Islam // Articles // The Islam Tax

By the president claiming we are only at war against al Qaeda, is like saying we were only at war with Nazis, and not Germany. Radical Islam is immense, it is globally powerful, it has unlimited financing, it has an ingenious plan of covert infiltration, and their numbers range over 200 million Jihadists or Jihad sympathizers. It’s costing us, more than we know.

Sorry, Mr. President, pandering to the Islamic world might sound nice, but it shows weakness.

And, by telling the world we are not at war with those who are at war with us, is pure suicide.

 

 

 

http://www.investigativeproject.org/document/id/20