Archives February 2009


Sometimes I didn’t particularly like the fellow who my daughter was dating. Sometimes, I didn’t much like her choice of clothing. When I made comments to the contrary, she ignored me.

Well…there’s only one way to handle such matters, right?

2007, Toronto. Aqsa Parvez, age 16, was strangled to death by her father for not wearing a Hijab (head scarf). Imagine that? Your daughter prefers to show her hair, and for that, she earns the death penalty.

July, 2008. Pakistani born, Sandeela Kanwal, age 25, lived in a suburb of Atlanta, Ga. She had been forced into an arranged marriage with an older man. She wanted a divorce. Her father strangled her with a bungee cord and called police. He told responding police Sergeant Stefan Schindler that her daughter was not being true to her religion, and that killing his daughter was a right given to him by God.



January, 2008. Texas. Amina Said, 18, and her sister Sarah, 17 were stalked and then shot to death by their father because they dated boys that were not Muslim. According to the Dallas Morning News, Yaser Said (the father) was given to “gun-waving rants about how Western culture was corrupting the chastity of his daughters.” (If western culture was so corrupting, what was he doing here?)

Imagine this one. April, 2004. Scottsville, NY. Turkish-born, Ismail Peltek bludgeoned his wife, and two daughters to death…including a four-year-old girl…because they had been the victims of a sexual assault by his brother. The little girl had been “sullied” by a gynecological exam and he was concerned about his family honor. When asked by the investigator, “If you had the opportunity to kill your family again, would you?”

He responded, “My female family, yes. My male family, no.”

Without further ado, we come to the most recent example of radical Islamic justice within the family unit, the butchery of a 37 year-old woman in Buffalo, NY, who wanted a divorce. Her husband, Muzzamill Hassan, a highly respected, “moderate” Muslim had been the owner/ operator of a television station which existed for the purpose of depicting Muslims in a positive light to the American public. According to reports, his wife was a frequent subject of abuse, and when she pushed for the divorce, he offed her head.

Think about that moment. The man and woman are alone. They fight. He prevails, and then takes a cutting instrument, and saws off the head of the woman he supposedly loves. Like butchering a moose. Messy business.

This certainly sends an ominous message to females in the culture. Any Muslim woman in America who has even thought about a divorce, or any young girls who have entertained the idea of dating outside the religion, will think twice. Better to live as chattel, than to not live at all.

This is happening in the United States. Not only Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, or even Great Britain.

It’s even more pervasive in Europe. And in some cases, more horrid. In London, Banaz Mahmod, age 20, fell in love with the wrong man. For that, she was raped, stomped and strangled by members of her family, and friends, before she was garroted with a bootlace. Her body was stuffed into a suitcase and dumped 100 miles away. After a three-month trial, her father and brother were found guilty for the crime. This was a premeditated, deliberate act. Read the story:

Click here: Woman raped before honor killing

According to the United Nations Population Fund, at least 5,000 honor killings take place every year within the Islamic world, though those numbers are probably much higher. In 2007, in the Punjab Province of Pakistan alone, there were 1261 honor killings. It’s been said that authorities often turn a blind eye to such acts within strict Islamic societies.

What’s particularly disturbing, is that these killings are not being committed by “radical” Muslims, or terrorists from al Qaeda, Hamas or Hezbollah. For the most part, they are committed by male family members — moderates — who have determined that it is their duty to dispatch a wife, daughter, or sister to the grave, because they violated family honor according to their perception of God.

Some folks will say domestic violence is common across all cultures and religions, and we shouldn’t attach special stigma to Islam in these matters. Maybe. Maybe not. As a thirty-year cop in Miami, I responded to my share of domestic violence calls, and investigated scores of family killings. Usually, they were acts of temper or jealousy, often brought on by drugs and alcohol. Sometimes, we probed a good mystery involving a love triangle. But in the thousands of murder cases I knew of in Dade County, Florida, I never heard of one where any man calculatedly killed a daughter/wife/sister in cold blood to preserve family honor as a duty to God.


It only exists in one culture. And that culture has come to the United States. And it’s not going away.

Meanwhile, let’s all remain politically correct and turn a blind eye. If you didn’t notice, most of the major networks other than FOX, — including CNN, CBS, NBC and ABC — played down the recent beheading case, did no follow-up stories at all.

I often reflect on trends. Ten or twenty years ago, we in America never encountered such a concept as “honor killing.” Today, we’re hearing more and more, in the U.S., Europe and throughout the world. What will be the trend in the next twenty years? Has it only just begun?

The following links are listed as supporting documents to the above-listed scenarios.


Click here: Aqsa Parvez

Click here: Man Accused Of Killing Daughter For Family Honor : NPR

Click here: Honor Killing in Texas – HUMAN EVENTS

Click here: Dhimmi Watch: New York: Man killed wife for ‘honor,’

Click here: Are Honor Killings Simply Domestic Violence? – Middle East Quarterly


The Academy Awards for 2009 will be announced in just two nights. I have seen all the nominated movies, and most of the nominated performances. I do believe the academy voters allow sentimentality and emotion to influence their votes, as seen many times in the past. The very best actor/actress performance doesn’t always win the prize. Such was the case when Jessica Lange’s performance in“Blue Sky” won over Jody Foster’s, “Nell” in 1994. No comparison. So, for my predictions, I will list who I think deserves to win, and who will actually win. Major categories only.

Best Movie:

Will win: Slumdog Millionaire

Should win: Slumdog Millionaire


Best Actor:

Will win: Sean Penn

Should win: Mickey Rourke

Best Actress:

Will win: Kate Winslet

Should win: Kate Winslet

Best Supporting Actor:


 Will win:     Heath Ledger

Should win: Robert Downey Jr.

Best Supporting Actress:


 Will win: Penelope Cruz

Should win: Amy Adams

Best Director:


 Will win: Danny Boyle

Should win: Danny Boyle


And, for the best movie, not mentioned in the Academy Awards listing:

The Boy In the Striped Pajamas


Your picks?








I was recently asked if I would attend a talk by members of a Muslim civil rights group, to show me how nice and harmless these people really are.

This blog is offered to those folks who think CAIR is just a harmless rights-seeking group representing the interests of poor Muslims that are subject to discrimination. I’ve heard some people refer to them as the ACLU for Islam in America. There’s much more to the story for those who are willing to pull their heads out of the sand, and learn.

Working for The Argus, in Fremont California, reporter Lisa Gardiner wrote an article for the newspaper after covering an Islamic conference in 1998. One of the sessions was titled, “How should we as Muslims live in America.” On the panel, sat the founder of the Council on American-Islamic Affairs, (CAIR). This, in part is what she wrote:

Omar M. Ahmad, chairman of the board of the Council on American-Islamic relations, spoke before a packed crowd at the Flamingo Palace banquet hall, urging Muslims not to shirk their duty of sharing the Islamic faith with those who are “on the wrong side.”
Muslim institutions, schools and economic power should be strengthened in America, he said. Those who stay in America should be “open to society without melting (into it).”
Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant, he said. The Koran…should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth, he said.





Considered a reputable reporter, Ms. Gardiner has since taken a position as legislative aide for the Democratic Party in California. She has otherwise expressed a positive attitude toward Muslims in general citing the need to learn more about diversity of religions, and claiming her personal interaction with Muslim leaders as “positive and enriching.” The point: This is not some hate-ridden, Islamophobe out to degrade Muslims. Her account is credible. Mr. Ahmad, founder and leader of the group, said a mouthful we should all be wary of.

Click here: Should Quran be top authority

Before zeroing on CAIR, people should know from where and why they originated. Anyone who knows anything about the global Islamic movement to ultimately establish dominion over the west, knows about the Muslim Brotherhood. Originally based in Egypt, this is a vast organization of extremists who are, in essence, the top brass pulling the strings, establishing organizations, funneling money and coordinating the peaceful takeover of the west via subversive infiltration, as opposed to the use of violence, which they consider a last resort. The basic rule of their methodology, is to present the perception of “moderation” at all times via the practice of deception. To blend in. To apply Taqqiya.

(I welcome readers to google any of this information, or to read many of the books out there written by scholars and investigators knowledgeable in this area, including Daniel Pipes, Paul Sperry, Steve Emerson, Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Spencer, David Horowitz, and more)

The Muslim Brotherhood has set into place, scores of influential organizations to help further the cause of global Jihad, particularly in the west. Among them, is the MSA (Muslim Student Of America) the largest and most powerful student uprising group in our colleges and universities today. Another outgrowth, the most formidable, is the organization known as CAIR.

I have written about this before, but it cannot be emphasized enough. Leaders from the Muslim Brotherhood penned a secret document in 1982, spelling out their plan for establishing world domination. In it, this alarming statement: (source: Wikipedia)

General Strategic Goal for the Group in North america makes the objectives of the MB clear: “The Ikhwan (Arabic brothers) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” 

 Among their many strategies, clearly spelled out in their manifesto, are:

* Putting into place a watchdog system for monitoring Western media to warn Muslims of “international plots fomented against them.”
* Use deception to mask the intended goals of Islamist actions, as long as it doesn’t conflict with shari’a law



One need only to examine the present status of European countries to see the tremendous gains the radical movement has made over the last twenty years. And with unharnessed birth rates, and immigration, the next twenty years will see even greater power shifting to the Islamic world.  

That same movement has rooted in within the U.S., under the cloak of the M.B, using its varied organizations such as CAIR, to create fear and intimidation, to raise legal issues in support of Islamic causes, to form a powerful lobby in Washington, and to advance the causes of Islam in America. As in many places in Europe, it may soon be deemed a “hate crime” to voice an opinion which is not to the liking of radical Islamists.

The most glaring example, of course, of the CAIR mission is the incident involving the flying Imams of Minneapolis in November of 2006. It wasn’t so bad that these six men decided to start their praying vigil at the boarding gate before hundreds of boarding passengers. It wasn’t so bad that they had apparently called news camera crews to film the event. It wasn’t even so bad that they disrupted the entire plane by acting like idiots, drawing attention to themselves with loud Arabic conversation, and asking for seat-belt extenders (not needed) which can be used as weapons, and so forth. Passengers were duly alarmed.

What was so bad, was the law suit that followed. CAIR was right there, helping to sue not only the airline, but the passengers as well for alerting the crew to the suspicious behavior. All this, as a legal ploy to muzzle Americans if and when they feel threatened.

If anyone thinks that CAIR wasn’t in on the pre-planning of this event, I still have that ocean front property for sale in Montana.

Click here: Exposing the “Flying Imams”

Harmless rights-seeking group for abused Muslims? Please.


Daniel Pipes, recognized expert terrorism and Islamic affairs in the U.S., is one of many who has written volumes about CAIR and its sinister goals and methods. CAIR has been a defender of Osama Bin Laden prior to 9/11 and found any criticism of his to be “offensive to Muslims.” (Remember that phrase) CAIR has often been linked to terror organizations, including Hamas. CAIR has been known to intimidate moderate Muslims who reject their extremist agenda. CAIR considered the conviction of those responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombings, as a “travesty of justice.” CAIR has been there for H. Rap Brown (now Jamil Al-Amin) outraged over his conviction for murdering an Atlanta police officer. Read Pipes’ account, and remember that this is but one of many.

Click here: CAIR: ‘Moderate’ friends of terror

And for a comprehensive list of links and information exposing the motives and mission of CAIR, please check out:


Click here: *Anti-CAIR*

The FBI has recently cut off all contacts with the CAIR group, citing their support of Hamas groups. Robert Mueller, Director of the FBI, is one of the more liberal-minded leaders in Washington D.C. when it comes to accepting and working with Muslims. He has been the subject of criticism for assembling Jew-free translation units so that Muslims don’t have to work side-by-side with Jews. He’s been instrumental in hiring Muslims as agents, even in the wake of one Islamic agent who refused to wear a wire when investigating other Muslims.

The last thing the FBI wants to do is get on the wrong side of the Muslim issue, but it has found this necessary when it comes to CAIR.



One aspect of my research that I bear in mind at all times: “Deception” is acceptable if it is employed to further the cause of Islam and its goal for world dominion.


To my friends who choose to see life through those rose-colored glasses, it’s time to take them off and see things as they are, not as you wish them to be.

No…I don’t want to sit in on some sanitized lecture by members of CAIR. I know their true agenda. I’ve heard hundreds of criminals tell me they didn’t do it…and sound believable. No more. I’m retired.

But I am deeply concerned about the future of America. You should be too.




I’m one of those pro-choice advocates. To my mind, it’s important to keep Roe V. Wade on the books for two primary reasons:

1) Support the woman’s right to choose (obviously).

2) To prevent abortions from reverting to the back-alley incompetents, pre-1972.

Just like many other so-called “sins,” making abortion illegal will not stop abortions from happening. They just fuel the black market, and the procedure becomes much less safe.

That said, it pains me to write any article which leans more to the liking of the pro-life side of the abortion issue. But, in the case of a live births and viable fetus’, it’s essential that states draw a stricter line in the name of decency and righteousness.

Recently, the Board of Medicine revoked the license of Florida Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique for medical malpractice stemming from a botched abortion in which a fetus was born alive, then discarded by unlicensed personnel who were in attendance.

It happened in 2006. The mother, an 18 year-old woman in Hialeah, Florida, was 23 weeks pregnant. The day before the procedure, the doctor prescribed a drug that dilates the cervix. She arrived at the clinic the next day, but the doctor was delayed, called to another emergency patient. In the meanwhile, the young woman delivered the fetus on her own. According to a lawsuit filed by the woman’s attorney, one of the clinic owners knocked the infant off a chair, scooped it up and placed it, with placenta, into a bag and threw it out. Following a tip, police found the remains a week later.

Amazingly, when the doctor arrived, he began performing the abortion unaware that the child had been born. Clinic personnel were obviously not forthcoming. Neither were they licensed and qualified.

The medical examiner determined the baby had breathed air, and deemed the cause of death as “extreme prematurity.”

This is an example of nightmarish events that weaken the argument for the pro-choice lobby and gives teeth to the other side. This woman was nearly five months pregnant, a period in which some early deliveries result in severely premature, but viable births.

Currently, Florida law allows for the termination of pregnancy within the first two trimesters. That’s far too dangerous. It would be far more logical and safer to limit abortion procedures to the first trimester only, with due exceptions regarding the health and/or survival of the mother.

Such an amended law would preclude these kinds of travesties where tiny babies are capable of sustaining life on their own. According to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 88 percent of all abortions in America are currently performed in the first trimester, and only 1.5 percent after 20 weeks. We need to change that 88 percent, to 100 percent.

Meanwhile, abortion would remain legal and the black market butchers in wait would still remain out of business.

Doctor Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique certainly ran a slipshod operation in Hialeah, and the Board of Medicine was right to revoke his license. It begs the question, how many other clinics are run in this same manner?

It would also appear fitting that one or more of the clinic personnel should be prosecuted, but the existence of admissible evidence beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt, is another matter for the state attorney to weigh.

Proponents of the pro-choice movement — who are constantly under the gun — should be doing a better job of monitoring abortion clinics around the states. Ones like Dr. Renelique’s brings discredit to their cause.




This post was published in November of 2007.  Reposted on this date, with comments included.


Posted on November 30th, 2007 by Marshall Frank in Criminal Justice, Edit

The War on Drugs is lost. Our nation has spent nearly a trillion dollars since the 1970’s trying to enforce unenforceable laws, which have only served to fuel the black market and incarcerate millions of otherwise non-violent offenders.

If a football coach sends in a losing play, game after game, and never gains ground, he must either change the strategy or find another job. Lawmakers in America continue with the same losing strategy, year after year, while we pay for it with billions in tax dollars and human life. Tell me please, how much sense that makes.

The drug laws are in dire need of revision. Sitting atop the list: Marijuana.

In an open letter to the president, congress, governors and state legislatures, Harvard Economist Professor Jeffrey A. Miron called for the legalization of marijuana and replacing it with a system of taxation and regulation. More than five hundred distinguished economists from around the nation signed off on that letter, including the most notable, Milt Friedman.

In essence, he claims the combined savings from enforcement and revenues would reap upwards of $14 billion a year.

I think…more.

During my thirty years in law enforcement, I was never in a position to jail anyone for disputable statutes, i.e. prostitution, gambling or drugs. I was lucky. Murder, rape and robbery are indisputable crimes. But drug possession, prostitution and gambling, outside of man’s subjective determination, does not necessarily constitute criminal behavior.
It is more of an abomination against humanity to incarcerate human beings for years upon years in stinking cages and destroying lives for behavior that can be treated in more constructive, and less costly ways. We are a vengeful society who believes the only solution to undesirable behavior is to lock ‘em up and throw away the key. We are supposed to be civilized?

After seven decades of deeming these acts illegal, we should ask the question: Have laws prohibiting these behaviors produced the desired effect? Has it deterred people from engaging in the use of marijuana? We all know the answer.

Alcohol prohibition of the 1920s not only failed to stop people from drinking, it fostered the emergence of organized crime syndicates as we still know them today. Black markets can only exist at the behest of law makers. Cartel leaders and crime syndicates thrive on laws that keep drugs illegal. I know. In the 1950’s, my bookie stepfather funneled big money to state politicians every election year for one purpose: To keep gambling illegal.

I am not an advocate nor a user of marijuana. I abhor drugs. My own family has been touched with the horror of drug addiction. Well-intended but ineffective laws that kept marijuana illegal did him more harm than good. It certainly prevented nothing.

I concede, that marijuana may damage short-term memory, impair judgment, alter heart rates and has the potential to create anxiety, paranoia and lethargy. But there is no data available to suggest one death has been caused by cannabis. Diseases related to nicotine are responsible for over 430,000 deaths a year, yet cigarettes are not only legal, the tobacco industry has been subsidized by the government for many years.

I am among the groundswell that is growing in America to decriminalize marijuana. So are more than five thousand former law enforcement officers and prosecutors that belong to an organization called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP). Visit:

Besides the economists lobby, there are six solid reasons to legalize marijuana:
1 – Taxpayer waste. The direct costs involved in the federal enforcement of marijuana laws extend beyond $7.5 billion annually. That doesn’t mention the huge costs to state and local law enforcement which is double that. Add: the costs of court, prison and parole. At a time when a real war is being waged around the globe to protect our nation, we are chasing around after pot-heads and pot sellers who, in reality, present little danger to anyone except themselves.

2 – Wasted lives. With less than five percent of the world’s population, the United States houses 25 percent of the world’s prison inmates. Nearly 60 percent of inmates are in prison for drug related offenses, more than half of them, marijuana possession and/or smuggling. The annual cost for housing over two million inmates is $50 billion per year. This does not include ripple effect costs, such as lost wages, welfare to their families, broken homes, single-parent kids, plus the cost of courts, defense lawyers, probation and parole.
The true cost is more than $100 billion a year.

3 – The law is meaningless. Despite all the tax monies spent for interdiction, enforcement and incarceration, marijuana remains the third most popular recreational drug of choice behind alcohol and tobacco products. After seventy years of criminal prohibition, 15 to 20 million Americans are users of marijuana, while 70 million have inhaled pot sometime in their lives.

4 – The law creates criminals. Laws against marijuana fuel the black market and keep the criminals in business. And with those laws come the inherent dangers to police officers in every jurisdiction in America. They clog the court system, cost billions, incite corruption and create cynicism among the general public. With new laws that regulate and permit sale, marijuana smugglers and dealers will be out of business.

5 – It sets a poor example to the young. Opponents invariably argue that legalizing marijuana will send the wrong signals to kids. That doesn’t happen. Kids in every high school in America know how easy it is to buy a joint or an ounce of grass. It’s at their beckon call. It sends a signal that the law is impotent and easily broken. Those who believes that the illegality of marijuana has been a deterrent to pot smokers are living in dreamland.

6 – Medical marijuana. Twelve states have legalized the use of medical marijuana, with more to surely follow. Yet, the federal government continues to usurp states rights by enforcing federal statues prohibiting doctors from prescribing cannabis to patients suffering from disease-related pain, nausea, eye disease, epilepsy and other diseases. There can be no other explanation, other than corruption in government and intervention of the powerful pharmaceutical lobby. Visit:Factbook: Medical Marijuana

I could tell horror stories about young men and women who are needlessly spending many years behind bars, people who made mistakes, people who needed treatment for their own foibles, people who otherwise could contribute to society and bring joy to others in this world, people who are basically harmless to you and I, but will not see the light of freedom for much of their lives, detached from families and relegated to dependency on the state — you and me — for sustenance.

Milt Friedman and the 500 plus economists are correct. Will anyone lend an ear?

I’m not holding my breath.


  1. Outstanding article and 100% correct. Those that want to fry their brains, via alcohol and/or drugs, have at it. Take the profit margin away from the cartels and organized crime groups. Legalize certain drugs and cut costs, saving taxpayers billions of dollars in a war we cannot and never did have a chance to win.

    Edit Comment

  2. the attitude toward pot use of kids under 18 is too casual among adults who believe it is not a big deal. There are inadequte responses to the use of it by teens and preteens., It is a BIG PROBLEM in terms of learning and academoic attitudes, and school performance. Pot heads lose precious years of developmental growth. … and costly later in terms of corrective measures when people need to find work and have healthy relationships and careers. After 21 I guess we “choose” to be addicts??? But we need a much crisper response to teen use…as we have to other drug use.Many former pot head parents identify with their kids use…after all…they turned out ok,,,,,many do not know how to take an honest and firm position with their kids. get help for the kids!!!!

    Edit Comment

  3. Right on Marshall! All that money spent to no avail. If people in government are intelligent, they would know that if the demand is high, people will find a way to satisfy that demand.
    We have made rich people out of criminals and keep on doing it. Tobacco is next on the list of banned drugs and this will create more millionairs and up the cost of drug enforcement.
    Will we learn? I doubt it.

    Edit Comment

  4. For years I have been in favor of legalization of marijuana, but have never set down my reasons as you have so effectively done. Here’s hoping you and the 500 economists will continue to campaign for it. Can we all help by writing our congressmen?

    Edit Comment

  5. While preparing dinner last night, I had the boob tube on as background noise. Dr. Phil does provide some noise, as do his whining guests needing his help. But one thing he said remained with me. “I hope this is the year that common sense prevails.” Legalizing marijuana is one of the common sense acts that we need to make in this country. I also read the fact a while back that you refer to about the ratio of the US population to its prison inmate population and the percentage of those who are in for drug-related offences, many of them just for pot possession. I don’t use or advocate usage of pot, but do classify it in the same category as alchohol. Too many lives are broken as a result of these draconian laws and the costs to all of us are too high. As our national budget drains spiral out of control, citizens need to become vocal about where our tax dollars go. This is one area we should reign in.

    Edit Comment

  6. If we legalize marijuana Ricky Williams would have been playing football for the past two years!

    If we also legalized the use of steoids, Barry Bonds would get into the Hall of Fame (or shame)?

    If we also legalize prostitution, either straight or gay, many of our politicians would still be in office.

    WOW what a thought!

    If we recognize illegal aliens we can let them take full advantage of our social security system, health care, schools, etc.

    We legalized abortion so the population is ot growing out of control (better than war maybe but we have that to)

    Hey, I was in law enforcement also, and I do not agree that we make things easier by changing moral and ethical values to satisfy the minority.

    Wow, what a thought

    Edit Comment

  7. Marshall,
    The only way I would support legalization of pot is if all the drugs coming across the border were captured, taxed and treated like any other import, with an import tax. Then people could buy it legally and use it at their discretion.

    Edit Comment

  8. I agree completely. As you know, the cost of keeping a person in prison is far more than the cost of living for nearly all others. If we could get rid of the drugs we would nearly empty the prisons. If marijuana was decriminalised the millions saved in law enforcement costs, jail and prison expense would be more than what the illegal stuff is costing us today. A double savings. Volunteering at the sheriff’s office I am aware of the dollar costs of enforceing the unenforceable.

    Edit Comment

  9. I agree, as an evaluations researcher and an individual, that current approaches have not led to the desired outcome. Perhaps, as you suggest, we really don’t want marijuana illegal, we just want to make the most money possible out of the deal. $14 billion is nothing compared to the money being made between importing, growing, selling, arresting, trying, incarcerating, lawmaking, law-enforcing,…need I say more?

    Laws exist to create an environment that allows people to live together in a way that works. As John (11/30) suggested, they often reflect the values of the culture. But that is not their intent. In fact, it is actually backwards. The intent of laws and rules is to protect the integrity of the culture – its ability to remain whole and complete, the ensure the survival of itself. Over time, it seems like the laws and rules are actual truth — as humans we have a propensity to forget that we made it all up.

    The question is – “Does the law making marijuana actually cause the outcome that it is intended to cause?” Is the intended outcome to eliminate the sale, distribution and use of marijuana in our society/culture? If so, then NO, the law is not producing this outcome. If the overall intent of the law is to preserve the culture itself, then perhaps it is effective. Consider that we are not a culture that has become enlightened enough to embrace diversity as the ultimate means of group (genetic) survival. We are an elitist run society where very few of those at the top are subject to the same laws that the rest of us face. For example, a felony conviction for drug possesion results in the removal of your right to vote. How convenient, no? Thus, from the view point of the lawmakers, the law is effective at preserving their culture.

    Many argue that marijuana is a ‘gateway’ drug. However, could the use of any illegal substance or participation in any illegal activity create a new environment which is more likely to foster the use of others? What I mean is “Is the gateway effect actually caused by the nature of it being illegal instead of the actual substance itself?”

    Marijuana’s illegalization may have nothing what-so-ever to do with the part of the plant that is smoked!!! “When companies such as Kimberly-Clark and the Hearst newspaper corporation found out their vast interests in paper could be undercut by this alternative (according to a 1938 article in Popular Mechanics — not to mention dozens of subsequent newspaper stories, books, and private communiques — marijuana can produce four times as much raw material per acre as trees for paper and similar uses, without contributing to soil depletion and the greenhouse effect), they teamed with bigot and director of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics Harry J. Anslinger to combat pot. DuPont and other companies that had invested heavily in the very things marijuana would replace joined the battle. The movie Reefer Madness was released in 1936;” AND “In 1942, five years after marijuana was banned, the world was at war. With the pressure on, the government was forced to fight the hype of the mid-Thirties that led to pot’s prohibition and admit that the weed was our last, best hope. The film is called Hemp for Victory, and you’ve probably never heard of it. No one in the U.S. government wants you to.” (Miami New Times, The Need for Weed, May 11, 1994).

    From, “First the Seed, Then the Weed” in Miami New Times (1993)”…the money from taxes on legal dope would reduce the national debt; beleaguered farmers would be given a new lease on life; countless hemp products could be cheaply and efficiently manufactured in this country; trees would be spared; fuel prices would plummet; air pollution would be greatly reduced; the critically ill would be spared a measure of suffering; world hunger would be cut; drugs that actually cause pain and crime could be more adequately controlled;…”

    The simple fact is very few – if any – banks, homes or businesses have been robbed at gunpoint so someone could get their next marijuana fix, right?! The issue of morality is moot in a discussion about the legalization of marijuana. It’s about money. Show the elitist snobs making laws how they can continue to grow their bank accounts (and only interact with ‘the other half’ as the help or work) and it will be legal. It’s all and only about money.

    Edit Comment

  10. MF,
    If it’ll make them happy, legalize it. After all, that’s what we want in the world… happy people.

    Why not substitute terms such as child pornography, credit card fraud or even Radical Islam in America every time you use the term cannabis or marijuana in the following quotes from your article?

    “But there is no data available to suggest one death has been caused by cannabis.”

    “Have laws prohibiting these behaviors produced the desired effect? Has it deterred people from engaging in the use of marijuana? We all know the answer.”

    Yea, let’s legalize it. Then we can start working on coke, meth, child porn, credit card fraud and Radical Islam in America.

    If you were just a couple of days younger, maybe you’d be more conservative.

    Edit Comment

  11. Very interesting article,Marshall, and interesting replies. I think everything was covered in those responses. I don’t think there’s a chance it will ever be legalized, however.

    Edit Comment

  12. Hi, Marshall;
    As an aging broad, I have never tried marijuana or any other hallucinogenic drug. I’ve always gotten high on life. But with a son with AIDS and many pain-inducing debilities, and a daughter with end-stage renal disease, RA, neuropathy and a host of of other diabetes-related ailments, it seems that pot is the only thing that relieves her proneness to vomiting. For these people especially, it should be legalized. Her state does not permit even medical use of the drug.

    Thanks for your interest, your research, and your willingness to share the information.


    Edit Comment

  13. “Why not substitute terms such as child pornography, credit card fraud or even Radical Islam in America every time you use the term cannabis or marijuana in the following quotes from your article?”

    Comparing things that are known to harm people other than oneself automatically discredits your argument. Perhaps you should try again. :)

    Great article. I live in Canada where they’re a little less harsh when it comes to weed (though, thanks to our recent Conservative government, they’re getting a little harsher), but these are great points. The problem down in the US is that the prison-industrial complex will continue to lobby for keeping drugs illegal and I don’t expect to see a change in such laws down there anytime soon.

    Edit Comment

  14. Marshall,
    Legalizing Illegal substances won’t eradicate the problems associated with them any more than the problems associated with alcoholism did with the legalization of alcohol. I agree that tons of money is wasted in our attempts to combat marijuana but the issue falls in the laps of our politicians,i.e., legislators, senators, congress men and women, the supreme court and any one else that legislates our laws.
    I take exception to your claim that not one death can be attributed to the use of Marijuana. Yes, Maybe the smoking of a joint won’t kill you but it damn well sure will cause you to do things that can produce death.
    One of your responders mentioned that marijuana is a gateway substance and I agree. That was the first illegal substance my son experimented with. It led to other substances that eventually cost him his life. Oh, I’m not alone as a suffering parent. Hardly a family exists that has not experienced a negative episode with illegal substances. Legalizing whatever is not the answer. Insisting on proper conduct and a good work ethic from our elected officials would produce much better results.
    Is the fact that you keep mentioning your experience in law enforcement supposed to impress us? I was in law enforcement longer than you were and I certainly do not consider myself an expert on illegal substances. Those that choose drugs as a way of life should make better choices. Once you are hooked try to find a decent drug rehab program that truly has good results. While you are at it check their fees which make them prohibitive for the average family.

    Edit Comment

  15. We are a Christian nation as the fundamentalists like to say. We live by the Protestant ethic of personal responsibility, hard work and sobriety. We believe strongly in
    PUNISHMENT! The “Christians” would never endorse SIN, the politicians won’t propose legalization and risk losing the votes of the
    sanctimonious. Costs, harmlessness, need,etc don’t enter into the calculation. Being good and right is what we care about and that’s why we won’t let pot heads or anybody else have pot.Don’t try to confuse us with the facts, Marshall, our mind is made up and we’ll go on paying with borrowed money no matter how well less virtuous nations succeed with decriminalization.

    Edit Comment

  16. First to the lady complaining about the teens using illegal drugs. There is an answer to that, it’s called parents. Granted it doesn’t always work, but the law certainly doesnt.
    Second I think there is a difference between de-criminalizing drugs & making them legal.
    Marshall is right about this & many of his other ideas.
    Keep up the good work.
    I’ve also read your books & think they are great.

    Edit Comment

  17. Marshall: People who think like this one above from RBC: ” I take exception to your claim that not one death can be attributed to the use of Marijuana. Yes, Maybe the smoking of a joint won’t kill you but it damn well sure will cause you to do things that can produce death.” says it all>

    Hey, RBC, exactly WHAT is it that these pot heads are doing that ‘ produces death ?” Can you answer that? There is NO death associated with cannabis, none. The black market is THERE, and will not go away by ignoring it..saying things like some of the blind people above makes me wonder about America. How ignorant can some people get?

    the drug war is a FAILURE but some here would say ” Oh well, better that than admit defeat and try something that WORKS “..not that it makes any sense!! If everyone would read Jack Herer’s book, ” the Emporer Wears No Clothes ” about hemp and the truth, we would see far fewer ignorant and ridiculous statements by the anti- sense crowd.

    Rape and such being compared to pot? My God some people must Watch fox news so much that their brains fry. The intellectuals all agree: legalize and tax and control: The morons want to keep the same old failed Nazi regime way of doing things going…sick.

    Edit Comment

  18. I agree with everything you said. Sending people to prison for using drugs is such a waste. The money should be spent on rehab programs.
    I am also in favor of legalizing prostitution and requiring the prostitutes be licensed and have health checks.

    Edit Comment

  19. have long thought putting people in prison is a terrible waste of lives and money. rehab programs would be a better use of the money. But my son, who with his wife, is very active in the N/A program tells me that rehab will only work if the person wants it. Just as A/A will only help if the person wants to quit drinking. I think if we legalize drugs all those billions going out of our country to the cartels will end. and hopefully people will not rob to get the money for drugs. And the money for law enforcement can be use for rehab. And the drug money will not tempt and corrupt cops and politicians. I once read that law makers are afraid to vote to legalize drugs. the cartel threatens them.

    Edit Comment

  20. Marshall,
    I agree with most of your articles, however, I disagree with: “The War on Drugs is lost”, “We are a vengeful society who believes the only solution to undesirable behavior is to lock ‘em up and throw away the key”, “while 70 million have inhaled pot sometime in their lives(not sure how you got this one, must be the economists again)”, “people who are basically harmless to you and I, but will not see the light of freedom for much of their lives”.

    You know, and I remind you, that drug users are not taken away “for much of their lives” and often even the street pushers are granted a variety of options before they are ever incarcerated beyond the initial arrest and bonding procedure.

    When you say there are more than five thousand former law enforcement officers and prosecutors that belong to an organization called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), I say thank God for the other hundreds of thousands that do not.

    Finally, regarding Siobhan M.’s response about “First the Seed, Then the Weed” in Miami New Times (1993)”; it’s absurd for one to believe that taxes on legal dope would in some way reduce our national debt, save the farmers (who apparently can’t grow legal stuff for profit), save the trees, reduce fuel prices at the pump, reduce air pollution, save the ill from suffering and pain and I have to put this last one in upper case because it’s the best one, CUT WORLD HUNGER.

    I think some of the responders to your article have been getting a little close to the ’smoke’.

    Although flawed it was a good article, keep the fire burning.

    Edit Comment

  21. Sorry, I was so intrigued with the article and responses I neglected one other thought, legalize ‘medical marijuana’.

    Edit Comment

  22. Got em thinking on this one….Good article, some good responses, some others need to get a life….Keep up the good work.

    Edit Comment

  23. I whole heartedly agree. Pot is no more harmful than boozing.

    Edit Comment

  24. “the money from taxes on legal dope would reduce the national debt; beleaguered farmers would be given a new lease on life; countless hemp products could be cheaply and efficiently manufactured in this country; trees would be spared; fuel prices would plummet; air pollution would be greatly reduced; the critically ill would be spared a measure of suffering; world hunger would be cut; drugs that actually cause pain and crime could be more adequately controlled;…”

    The above is from Siobhan’s very eloquent comments. I don’t think I understand how fuel prices would plummet, nor how air pollution would be greatly reduced and world hunger would be cut. I DO support the legalization and taxation as a concept whose time is long past due. But, I wonder if sometimes over-claiming the benefit can have an opposite effect on the ultimate goal.

    I look forward to the day when common sense prevails in Congress. Given the track record, I can only think of the old joke “What if I was an idiot, and what if I was in Congress? But then, I repeat myself”.

    Edit Comment

  25. I agree 100%. I am a sophomore in college, and I see more drug and alcohol abuse on a daily basis than most people can say they’ve seen in their whole lives. I have seen people’s lives ruined all because they got caught sitting harmlessly in their apartments smoking weed. However, I’ve also seen kids my age kill and be killed by the abuse of alcohol. Not long ago, 2 boys were killed because they both attempted to cross a busy intersection drunk. No one does anything to prevent people from drinking themselves to death, but the government goes as far as they possibly can to prevent people from smoking weed. I got high and no one died. It has been proven that pot is not addictive, is far less harmful than cigarettes, and not a single human being has ever been reported dead from smoking too much weed.Legalizing marijuana would have a huge impact on decreasing the crime rate, and it could be used for medical purposes. In my opinion, there are far worse things in the world than marijuana. people make smoking weed out be a horrible thing to do. If the worst thing a person ever did was smoke weed, then I’d say they lead an extremely successful life. It has nothing to do with ethics and/or morals, it’s got to do with common sense. Come on now.

    Edit Comment

  26. Look, I can speak from immediate experience. I got picked up in July for having a parking ticket warrant outside my favorite bar…for leaving my car when intoxicated. I was unaware because the ticket was snagged off. I got arrested for it and had a gram of commercial weed on me. I was stopped while waiting for a ride from my sister mind you. Since then I have been to court several times, have a probation officer who I visit every month. I can have my house, person, car, and property searched at any time without reason. This will go on for a year. I then got sent to a firm for a “substance abuse evaluation”. This company only makes money if they recommend treatment. Three hours a night three outs a week. Also costing the state. I am not an addict and no longer use for fear of trouble. I am a young man(24) and am also not allowed to have a drink or go to a place who makes the majority of their money from alcohol…even as a DD. Mind you, this is not an alcohol related offense….they might as well have taken away my television. Any way, long story short, I will be in the “system” for a year. There is no “victim” in my crime. This is a huge waste of everyones time. Also, I find in incredibly ridiculous that people who have never tried the product(weed) can say its not legal..and if they have tried it…why are they being taking seriously in the “anti-weed” campaign. I am absolutely astonished at my treatment and feel as if “my” country has more than failed me. BOND TOGETHER…GET SERIOUS…AND LETS GET IT RIGHT…LEGALIZE IT NOW!! IT WILL TAKE WORK, BUT RATHER THAN BE A “POTHEAD” BE A PART OF THE SOLUTION. DO YOUR PART!!

    Edit Comment

  27. Thank you for posting this Marshall. I couldn’t agree with you anymore. Smoking marajuana shouldn’t be a crime. It isn’t any more harmful to you than drinking alcohol. In fact it’s much safer. I just wish that more people in this world would understand that.

    Edit Comment

  28. The people who comment and try to compare cannabis legalization with real crimes that affect others is totally disengenuous and they know it. ALL of the offenses that they list are cause for complaint from some other person; The private use of herb does NOT in any way, shape or form affect anyone else negatively. It is just a cash cow for the system and the people who drool over Fox news every night have no idea what the truth is.

    The Czech Republic has a sensible policy towards cannabis, as does the Netherlands. ALL the statistics, all of them, show that LESS young people use cannabis where it is readily aavilable legally. Our system is a total failure for the intended purposes, and a great success for its hidden ones.

    All it takes is a little research into WHY it was made illegal back in 1938…the political chicanery, the lies and hidden hearings..the head of the AMA was outraged at the trickery to demonize a well known medicine and product. The ignorant are the only ones against pot: Adult use should NEVER be the business of the cops or courts..not in a free society.

    Edit Comment

  29. […] think if we legalize drugs all those billions going out of our country to the cartels will end. …, I’m A Medical Marijuana Patient. No, I’m Not Sorry.I can’t understand why anyone would look […]

    Edit Comment

  30. Marijuana has only been deemed illegal for 1% of its existence.

    That should really mean something in terms of it truly being compared to much more serious crimes.

    Great article!

    Edit Comment